Laserfiche WebLink
(Figure 2). Relative growth of Colorado squawfish was less than that of <br />fathead minnow in all experimental treatments. <br />Intersaecific exploitative competition <br />Negative effects of interspecific competition were greater for Colorado <br />squawfish than for fathead minnow. One-sample t-statistic comparisons showed <br />that Colorado squawfish grew significantly slower in four of nine <br />mixed-species treatments than in single-species assemblages (Table 1). Of the <br />remaining five mixed-species treatments, four had non-significant negative <br />effects on Colorado squawfish growth. The 25:75, 32 zooplankton•fish~'•day~' <br />experimental treatment was the only one in which Colorado squawfish growth was <br />not negatively affected; however, this response was not significantly <br />positive, suggesting that growth in mixed- and single-species assemblages may <br />have been equivalent. In contrast to Colorado squawfish, fathead minnow <br />growth was significantly reduced by competition in only one experimental <br />treatment. Of remaining mixed-species treatments, three had non-significant <br />negative effects and five had non-significant positive effects on fathead <br />minnow growth. <br />Inspection of tabulated d values showed that significant responses did <br />not occur more or less frequently as a function of relative abundance or <br />feeding regime (Table 1). There was a weak tendency for non-significant <br />positive values at low feeding regimes, and non-significant negative values at <br />high feeding regimes. No consistent trends were apparent within feeding <br />regimes. However, t-tests are inadequate for detection of quantitative <br />relationships within data sets (e.g., d as a function of relative abundance) <br />14 <br />