My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7760
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7760
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:29:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7760
Author
Beyers, D. W., R. T. Muth and M. S. Farmer.
Title
Experimental Evidence of Competition Between Larvae of Colorado Squawfish and Fathead Minnow.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(Figure 2). Relative growth of Colorado squawfish was less than that of <br />fathead minnow in all experimental treatments. <br />Intersaecific exploitative competition <br />Negative effects of interspecific competition were greater for Colorado <br />squawfish than for fathead minnow. One-sample t-statistic comparisons showed <br />that Colorado squawfish grew significantly slower in four of nine <br />mixed-species treatments than in single-species assemblages (Table 1). Of the <br />remaining five mixed-species treatments, four had non-significant negative <br />effects on Colorado squawfish growth. The 25:75, 32 zooplankton•fish~'•day~' <br />experimental treatment was the only one in which Colorado squawfish growth was <br />not negatively affected; however, this response was not significantly <br />positive, suggesting that growth in mixed- and single-species assemblages may <br />have been equivalent. In contrast to Colorado squawfish, fathead minnow <br />growth was significantly reduced by competition in only one experimental <br />treatment. Of remaining mixed-species treatments, three had non-significant <br />negative effects and five had non-significant positive effects on fathead <br />minnow growth. <br />Inspection of tabulated d values showed that significant responses did <br />not occur more or less frequently as a function of relative abundance or <br />feeding regime (Table 1). There was a weak tendency for non-significant <br />positive values at low feeding regimes, and non-significant negative values at <br />high feeding regimes. No consistent trends were apparent within feeding <br />regimes. However, t-tests are inadequate for detection of quantitative <br />relationships within data sets (e.g., d as a function of relative abundance) <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.