Laserfiche WebLink
and regression analysis provided a more detailed description of quantitative <br />relationships. <br />Regression analysis showed that the response of d as a function of <br />relative abundance within each feeding regime was variable (Table 2). For <br />Colorado squawfish in the two highest feeding regimes, there was a significant <br />reduction in growth as the relative abundance of fathead minnow increased. In <br />the lowest feeding regime, the regression was not significant, suggesting that <br />there was no relationship between Colorado squawfish growth and relative <br />abundance, or that the relation was not detected by statistical analysis. The <br />response of fathead minnow in the highest feeding regime was similar to that <br />of Colorado squawfish: growth declined as the relative abundance of the <br />competitor increased. No statistically significant relationship was detected <br />in the intermediate feeding regime. In the lowest feeding regime, growth of <br />fathead minnow increased significantly with relative abundance of the <br />competitor. This response is inconsistent with ecological theory because it <br />implies that fathead minnow crew faster in mixed- than in single-species <br />assemblages (i.e., the inter ~~~ion had the form +/0). The cause of this <br />anomalous response is uncer_~rn, but may have resulted from failure to <br />maintain initial fish densities and relative abundances in the lowest feeding <br />regime. In that regime, fathead minnow survival ranged from 22 % to 53 %. <br />Because growth was slow in the lowest feeding regime, deviations of food <br />ration due to mortality may have had relatively large effects. <br />Competitive ability <br />In contrast to t-test and regression methods which detected competitive <br />effects by intraspecific comparisons of growth in mixed- and single-species <br />15 <br />