Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />t~ -SVP Average Annual Diversion; Draft Water Supply Appendix; Supplement to 1988 DPR for SFN, Vol 1, April 1997. <br />Figure 1-1, Pg. 1-5. <br />v -Derived from value for total Bonneville Unit diversion -+- evaporation from Strawberry Reservoir cited in Water Supply <br />Appendix to Draft Supplement DPR for SFN, Vol 1, April 1997, Table 6-2: 119,600 AF - 101,900 =17,700 AF <br />evaporation attributable to Bonneville Unit use of Strawberry Reservoir. Total evaporation from Strawberry Res. Is <br />29,500 AF (CUP +SVP) cited in Strawberry Water Supply Appendix Vol 2, Attach. F -Strawberry Reservoir Operation <br />Model Printouts, and Water Supply Appendix, vol 1, Figure 1-1, June 1997. 29,500 - 17,700 = 11,800 AF. <br />si -USBR. 1988. Suppl. to Definite Plan Report (88 DPR). Water Supply App. Vol II, Part III. Table IV-6. P. IV-22. <br />Provo River Operations Study updated and included in 88 DPR in support of M&[ System of Bonn. Unit, CUP. Models <br />theoretical average diversions of Provo River Project under full demand, and with Jordanelle Reservoir operating under <br />full demand, for years 1931 to 1973. Utah State Engineers records of actual diversions through Duchesne Tunnel for <br />1954 to 1996 show average of 22,200 AF per yeaz. We believe the 31,700 AF figure is the more realistic picture of <br />Duchesne diversions because it recognizes full operation of the system, a condition not reflected in the historic diversions <br />to date. <br />4~ -USBR. 1988. Proposed Rehab. and Betterment Program. Moon Lake Project, Utah. Revised 1988. Pg. II-11, Table <br />II-1. Includes only Federal project water diversions 1970 - 1986 averaging 49,074 AF per yeaz. Assuming 50% <br />efficiency due to flood irrigation practices. <br />si -Supplemental water delivered to Midview Res. to irrigate lands served under the Midview Exchg. 1'lie majority of tl~e <br />diversions is accounted for unclcr ¢/. Midview Exchg. Allows diversion of a percentage of the annual yield <br />(11,600/21,400) of Starvation Reservoir. Average diversions from water year1988 through water year 1996 have been <br />11,915 AF (CUWCD Water Delivery Records). Assume 50% efficiency due to flood irrigation practices(rounded to <br />5000). Due to the history of and complexities of the Midview Exchange, it is possible this 5000 AF is also included <br />entirely in 8/ (ie., double counted). Extensive new analyses of both depletions would be required to confirm this. <br />~ -Federal project Diversions of 250,000 AF/year (Average for 1994, 1995, and 1996; River Comm. Reports) and <br />assumed 50% efficiency due to flood irrigation practices. Does not include non-UIIP tribal diversions. Per Lynn Hansen, <br />BIA Irrigation Specialist, Ft. Duchesne, UT. Full utilization of the Ute Tribes' Federal Reserved Water Rights will result <br />in a depletion of 143,752 acre-feet per yeaz. (Bureau of Indian Affairs, Uintah and Ouray Agency, July 20, 1998). <br />~~ - Supplement to Definite Plan Report, Water Supply Appendix, Vol. 1, May 1989, text pp. 51-64 and Figure 2. Also, <br />see 1/. <br />~ -CUP water delivered out of Starvation Res. for irrigation in the Duchesne River agricultural area. See jl Table 6-2, <br />Pg. 6-11. 21,400 AF is under contract in Starvation Res. + 3000 AF not under contract but committed to non-Indian <br />irrigation (by exchange) until the Ute Tribe develops additional Class 3 and 4 lands. Assuming 65% efficiency due to <br />sprinkler irrigation practices. (24400 X 0.65 = 15,860) <br />9i -Draft Feasibility Report, Uintah Unit Replacement Project, Jan. 1997, p. 5-10. <br />10~ -Draft Feasibility Report, Upalco Unit Replacement Project, Nov. 1996, p. 5-9. <br />