Laserfiche WebLink
impacts cannot be avoided, the Bureau will provide appropriate mitigation <br />or compensation. <br />No Indian trust assets occur in the floodplain ponds along the Colorado and <br />Gunnison rivers. Therefore, control of nonnative fish species will not <br />adversely impact such assets if they did exist in the floodplains of either <br />river. <br />H. Environmental Justice. Executive Order 12898 established environmental <br />justice as a federal agency priority to ensure that minority and low-income <br />groups are not disproportionately affected by Federal actions. The <br />ethnicity of the majority (90%) of residents in the project area is white <br />(Grand Junction Area Chamber of Commerce 1997). However, other ethnicities <br />of persons in the area include (hispanic (8%), Native American 0.7%), Asian <br />(0.6~), and black (0.4%). A public news release was issued by the Bureau <br />to all potential affected interests (i.e., agencies, organizations, or =__ <br />individuals) who may be affected by the proposed action. <br />Access to floodplain ponds on private and public land will be gained through <br />landowners who are willing to participate in this Recovery Program effort. <br />No disproportionate negative impacts are known that~may affect low-income <br />individuals or groups through control of nonnative fish species. <br />IV. ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br />AND <br />PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE <br />None of the five alternatives discussed below will adversely impact historic and <br />cultural resources, Indian trust assets, or environmental justice (Table 2). <br />Therefore, these environmental factors will not be discussed in detail under the <br />various alternatives. Other environmental factors that will be affected will be <br />discussed under the appropriate alternative(s). <br />A. Alternative 1 - No Action. Under this alternative, nonnative, warmwater <br />fish species in floodplain ponds along the Colorado and Gunnison rivers <br />would continue to enter the river from ponds with outlets or during <br />connections with the rivers during high streamflows. <br />No additional impacts to vegetation and land use, historic and cultural <br />resources, or socio-economic factors would result from this alternative <br />because nothing would be done that would affect the present use and <br />condition of floodplain ponds. Discharge water from ponds with outlets to <br />the rivers would continue to be released into the rivers. During high <br />spring streamflows, floodplain ponds would be connected with the river for <br />varying lengths of time depending upon the runoff for any particular year, <br />the rate of snow melt in the mountains, and elevation reached during flood <br />conditions. <br />Chronic escapement of nonnative fish species into the rivers would continue <br />through outlets from the ponds or when high streamflows cause overbank <br />flooding. The negative impacts on the endangered Colorado River fishes from <br />predation and competition by nonnative, warmwater fishes would continue. <br />14 <br />