My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8215
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:23:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8215
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Final Environmental Assessment
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Management and Control of Noonative Fish Species in Floodplain Ponds of the Upper Colorado and Gunnison Rivers.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This situation is not conducive to the Recovery Program goals and objectives <br />to recover the endangered fishes in the Upper Colorado and Gunnison rivers. <br />Table 2. Summary of potential significant impacts associated with each of <br />the five alternatives to control nonnative fish species in <br />floodplain ponds along the Upper Colorado and Gunnison rivers. J <br />Environmental Factor Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Alt. 4 Alt. 5 <br />Ue etation and Land Use o 0 0 0 --- <br />Fish and Wildlife Resources o 0 0 0 0 <br />Endan eyed Species --- +++ ++ ++ o <br />Historic and Cultural <br />Resources 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Socio-Economic Factors o 0 0 0 --- <br />Indian Trust Assets o 0 0 0 0 <br />Environmental Justice o 0 0 0 0 <br />1/ (+) indicates some positive impact; (++) indicates a moderate positive <br />impact; (+++) indicates the greatest positive impact; (-) indicates some <br />negative impact; (--) indicates a moderate negative impact; (---) indicates <br />the greatest negative impact; (o) indicates no known impact. <br />B. Alternative 2 - Mechanical or Chemical Control of Nonnative Fish Species <br />From Ponds in the Floodplain. Under this alternative, mechanical (i.e., <br />draining ponds, netting, electrofishing, etc.) or chemical (i.e., use of <br />registered piscicides) control methods would be used to remove nonnative <br />fish species from floodplain ponds along the Colorado and Gunnison rivers. <br />Mechanical or chemical control of nonnative fishes could occur in a maximum <br />of 25 ponds in 1997 and up to 150 ponds through the Year 2002 (Martinez and <br />Nesler 1996). In reality, mechanical or chemical control techniques would <br />be employed in about 10 ponds during 1997. <br />Criteria for Selecting Ponds. Ponds will be identified as to location in <br />the floodplain (i.e., some in 10-year and 50-year floodplains). Access for <br />controlling nonnative fishes would be acquired from landowners who are <br />willing to cooperate. One objective of the proposed control measures is to <br />determine if nonnative fish control in floodplain ponds within a given river <br />reach contribute significantly to reductions in the abundance of nonnative <br />fishes in riverine nursery habitats that include backwaters, embayments, and <br />floodplain habitats that connect with the river. Therefore, the initial <br />proposed control measures are considered experimental and will be carefully <br />evaluated. <br />Description of Mechanical or Chemical Control. <br />mechanically using large-volume pumps. The fish <br />trapped for removal if feasible. If the ponds were <br />dissolved oxygen became -low, the nonnative <br />Ponds may be drained <br />could then be seined or <br />pumped to the point that <br />fishes would die from <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.