My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7749
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:19:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7749
Author
Kohm, K. A., ed.
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1991
Copyright Material
YES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
56 REFLECTIONS ON THE ACT <br />common since such plants are likely to serve important ecosys- <br />tem functions, whereas naturally rare species are less signifi- <br />cant. With their loss, the argument runs, less is lost. But <br />naturally rare species, as much as common ones, signify exuber- <br />ance in nature-each presents a unique expression of prolific <br />evolutionary potential. The rare flower is a botanical achieve- <br />ment, abit of brilliance, a problem resolved, a niche filled. The <br />local endemic species, perhaps one specialized for an unusual <br />habitat, represents a rare discovery in nature before it provides <br />rare values to the nation and its people. Although it might be <br />true that naturally rare plant species are of lesser ecological <br />value on a regional scale, rarity need not reduce scientific, aes- <br />thetic, educational, historical, and recreational values. <br />If one- insists on a restricted evolutionary theory, rare plants <br />are random accidents resulting from mutations and contingen- <br />cies of natural history. Such a biological origin might seem to <br />suggest little of value, little duty, and little to be lost. But a more <br />comprehensive theory also suggests that surviving plants must <br />be satisfactory fits in their environments. Sometimes they live <br />on the cutting edge of exploratory probing; sometimes they are <br />relicts of the past; often neither new nor old, they occupy niches <br />that have always been rare. Whatever the explanation of their <br />rarity, they offer evidence, promise, and memory of an inventive <br />natural history. Even more poignantly than the. common, they <br />are a sign of life persisting in struggling beauty, flourishing, <br />pushing on at the edge of perishing. The rare flower-if one <br />opens to a wider, philosophical perspective-offers a moment of <br />perennial truth. Life is a many-splendored thing; extinction of <br />the rare forms duns this luster. <br />Rhododendron chapmanii, though rare, has proved its right to <br />life, has proved that it is right for life, when tested by natural <br />selection. It is a satisfactory fit in its niche in the transition zone <br />between the dry longleaf pine forests and the moist Cyrilla <br />thickets. Some rare plants may be en route to natural extinction, <br />but it does not follow that most have less biological achievement <br />than common species. Endemics or specialized species may <br />competently occupy restricted niches. When the nation and its <br />people encounter such a species, its adaptive fitness in an ecosys- <br />tem generates a presumption that it is right for us to let them be. <br />A rare plant's roots literally go down in the landowner's land, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.