My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8116
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:45:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8116
Author
Elmblad, W. R.
Title
Evaluation of Stocking Channel Catfish in Kenney Reservoir, Colorado.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B. River sampling <br />1993 <br />The White River was divided into upper and lower reaches for sampling. Each sampling reach was <br />8 km (5 miles) long. The upper reach began 0.5 km below Taylor Draw Dam and went downstream <br />(RK 167-159). The lower reach was selected as RK 127-119 because of the location of an access <br />point at RK 121.6. However, due to good navigability the actual length electrofished was RK 130- <br />116. <br />Two sampling methods were used on the river: electrofishing and baited hoop nets. Electrofishing <br />was conducted using an 5.5 m (18 foot) jet powered, flat bottom boat with a three person crew. The <br />electrofishing equipment consisted of a 5,000 watt portable generator, a VVP 15, two spherical <br />anodes, and 15.2 m (50 feet: in 8 and 9 ft sections) of trailing steel cable cathode. Hoop nets were <br />two 0.8 m diameter x 3.6 m long and-two 1.1 m diameter x 4.6 m long nets with two throats each. <br />The electrofishing procedure was to move slowly downstream along one shoreline of the river in a <br />sampling reach. When this was completed, the other shoreline was sampled starting again from the <br />upstream end of the reach. Channel catfish were captured using long handled dipnets and placed in <br />alive tank for data processing. Other fish species encountered were not collected or counted. <br />Various settings in DC pulse were used on the voltage pulsator in an attempt to improve the catch <br />of channel catfish. A low voltage and amperage technique (<200 volts, 3 amps, 70-80% pulse width, <br />and 20 pulses per second) that has been used successfully in Arizona on flathead catfish (Brad <br />Jacobson, personal communication, Arizona Game and Fish Department, 1993) was tried numerous <br />times. However this technique was eventually discontinued because it did not improve catch rates <br />of channel catfish. A voltage pulsator setting of 190-200 volts, 3 amps, 20% pulse width, and 60 <br />pulses per second appeared to most consistently produce channel catfish and was used the majority <br />of the time. Electrofishing was conducted July 7-8 and 12-15. Effort was measured in seconds of <br />operaton by a timer on the voltage pulsator and later converted to hours. <br />Hoop nets were set in slow moving pools that were deep enough to cover the hoops. Bait was <br />mackerel flavored cat food, carp chunks, or fresh shrimp. Sampling occurred July 7-9, 13-15, and <br />September 1-3. Hoop nets were fished for 24 hours. <br />All channel catfish captured by electrofishing and in hoop nets were examined for an adipose fin <br />clip, measured for TL, weighed on a platform spring scale, and released. Channel catfish longer than <br />300 mm TL received an individually numbered Floy tag. At the recommendation of Tom Pellett <br />(personal communication, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, March 8, 1993) the <br />minimum 300 mm size to Floy tag river fish (as compared to 250 mm in the reservoir) was done to <br />increase survival of tagged fish in the riverine environment. Channel catfish shorter than 300 mm <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.