My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7844
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7844
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:43:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7844
Author
Elmblad, W. R.
Title
Kenney Reservoir, Channel Catfish Monitoring Study, 1993 Interim Report.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1993 Kenney Res. Channel Catfish Study Report <br />Page 3 <br />The secondary objective was to document escapement from Kenney <br />Reservoir downstream to the White River and determine, if possible, <br />the magnitude and timing of escapement. Channel catfish would not <br />be suitable for sportf ishery use if significant numbers emigrate <br />downstream into the White River. <br />If results indicate the sportf ishery <br />satisfactory and downstream escapement <br />Reservoir Lake Management Plan.~-iIl be <br />catfish stocking and that Plan will be <br />public input according to applicable <br />guidelines. <br />IV. Methods and Materials <br />potential of catfish is <br />is negligible, the Kenney <br />amended to include channel <br />distributed for agency and <br />nonnative fish stocking <br />The study focused on sampling fish populations in two waterbodies: <br />Kenney Reservoir and the White River below Kenney Reservoir. <br />A. Reservoir sampling <br />In 1993 Kenney Reservoir was sampled July 20 and 26-30, August 10- <br />13, and September 1-3. Total sampling time was 1,400 hours, using <br />five sampling methods: gill nets, trammel nets, baited hoop nets, <br />trotlines, and electrofishing. Gill nets were experimental variety <br />with 6 different mesh panels from 1/2 to 2 inches and were 150 feet <br />long x 4 feet deep. Trammel nets were 150 feet long x 6 feet deep, <br />1 inch inner wall x 12 inch outer wall mesh. Hoop nets were 2.5 <br />feet diameter x 12 feet long and 3.5 feet diameter x 15 feet long <br />nets with two throats each. Trotlines were 100 feet long with 25 <br />hooks per line. Electrofishing was conducted using a 16 foot flat <br />bottom boat with a 5,000 watt portable generator, a Coffelt WP 15 <br />voltage pulsator, two spherical anodes, and 34 feet (in 8 and 9 <br />foot sections) of trailing steel cable cathode. <br />The plan for selecting gill and trammel net placement sites was to <br />sample all reservoir habitat types around the shoreline of the <br />reservoir. There was no sampling in mid-reservoir surface, bottom, <br />or mid-water column areas. Habitat was characterized or typed <br />according to (1) the physical location of the set within the <br />reservoir; i.e., main lake, cove, or inlet; (2) the substrate along <br />the shoreline; i.e., bedrock, riprap, dirt with predominately large <br />rock (>1 foot diameter), dirt with predominately small rock (<1 <br />foot diameter), and dirt/mud bar; and (3) the shoreline grade; <br />i.e., steep or shallow. The purpose of this categorization was to <br />insure that all visible habitat types were sampled. All nets were <br />placed near shoreline and angled straight out into deeper water. <br />The electrofishing procedure was to sample along the shoreline <br />during both daytime and nighttime periods, The entire reservoir <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.