Laserfiche WebLink
RESTORATION OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS <br />Planning a restoration project must start with specifying the project <br />mission, goals, and objectives. Goals should be prioritized so that <br />project designers and evaluators have a clear understanding of their <br />relative importance. In addition to specifying goals, objectives, and <br />performance indicators, project managers and designers need to pro- <br />pose amonitoring and assessment program that is appropriate in <br />scale as well as in sampling frequency and intensity to measure the <br />performance indicators accurately and reliably, and thereby assess <br />progress toward the project's objectives, goals, and mission. Postproject <br />evaluation will enable scientists to determine when and to what de- <br />gree the system has become self-maintaining and whether or not the <br />restoration attempt was effective. <br />Monitoring of a restoration effort should include both structural <br />(state) and functional (process) attributes, and should not be restricted <br />to one level of biological organization. Monitoring of attributes at <br />population, community, ecosystem, and landscape levels is appropri- <br />ate in a restoration effort. <br />LAKES <br />By far the most widespread problem facing lakes and reservoirs is <br />agricultural nonpoint runoff of silt and associated nutrients and pes- <br />ticides. Lakes often do not cleanse or restore themselves. They are <br />sinks for incoming contaminants that recycle and maintain the im- <br />paired conditions. Federal drinking water standards, for example, <br />cannot be met, except with great difficulty and expense, unless de- <br />graded lakes and reservoirs are improved and then protected from <br />further contamination. <br />A net gain over the next 20 years of 2 million acres of restored <br />lakes, out of the current 4.3 million acres of degraded lakes, is an <br />achievable goal. By the year 2000, it is recommended that a mini- <br />mum of 1 million acres of lakes be restored. The costs for research, <br />development, and technical guidance are federal responsibilities. The <br />costs for actual restorations should be borne by federal and nonfederal <br />sources, working through individual state lake programs. The com- <br />mittee realizes that the goals for the restoration of lakes should be <br />realistic and tailored to individual regions of the country. Further <br />development of project selection, goal setting, and evaluation tech- <br />niques based on the concept of "ecoregions" as explained in Chapter <br />4 should be encouraged and supported by the U.S. Environmental <br />Protection Agency (EPA). <br />All states have degraded lakes, and each state should develop res- <br />