Laserfiche WebLink
Xii PREFACE <br />there is a special chapter on integrated aquatic ecosystem restoration <br />(Chapter 7) that discusses the failings of a fragmented approach and <br />speculates on the advantages to be derived from a more integrated <br />approach to restoring aquatic ecosystems. <br />The committee recognized the difficulty of producing a report of <br />acceptable length while also providing a useful level of detail on the <br />large number of restoration efforts that have been completed or are <br />in progress. It was decided that a limited number of illustrative case <br />studies would be selected for review and that the level of detail would <br />include only the information necessary to communicate the unique <br />attributes of each restoration effoxt. <br />This report describes the status and functions of surface water <br />ecosystems; the effectiveness of aquatic restoration efforts; the tech- <br />nology associated with those efforts; and the research, policy, and <br />institutional reorganization required to begin a national strategy for <br />aquatic ecosystem restoration. Although ground water is an impor- <br />tant natural resource in the United States and degradation of its qual- <br />ity has an effect on surface water supplies, the committee chose not <br />to review restoration of ground water. Despite increasing awareness <br />that some of the ground water in the United States is contaminated, <br />public policy toward ground water protection is still in the formative <br />stages. Increased technology and expanded monitoring activities <br />probably will detect the effects of past contamination and land uses <br />on water quality. Conclusive answers to questions about the loca- <br />tion, extent, and severity of ground water contamination, and about <br />trends in ground water quality, must await further collection and <br />analysis of data from the nation's aquifers.l The Water Science and <br />Technology Board has in progress at this time a separate, special, <br />detailed assessment of ground water remediation. <br />The committee was much influenced by the strategy of the former <br />NRC Committee on Applications of Ecological Theory to Environ- <br />mental Problems.2 Our committee shares the 1986 NRC committee's <br />perception that, whereas much about the functioning of ecological <br />systems remains poorly understood, it is common to fail to use even <br />available information when attempting to solve environmental prob- <br />lems. Finally, our committee also decided to provide examples of the <br />lU.S. Geological Survey. 1987. National Water Summary 1987. U.S. Geological <br />Survey Water-Supply Paper 2350. U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Denver, <br />Colorado. <br />ZNational Research Council. 1986. Ecological Knowledge and Environmental Prob- <br />lem-Solving. Commission on Life Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, <br />D.C. <br />