My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7636
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:36:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7636
Author
National Research Council
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1992
Copyright Material
YES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
571
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Preface <br />This report is the result of recognition by the Water Science and <br />Technology Board of the National Research Council's (NRC) Com- <br />mission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources that it should <br />be concerned with the emerging science of restoration ecology in <br />relation to aquatic ecosystems. <br />During its deliberations, the Committee on Restoration of Aquatic <br />Ecosystems found that almost every restoration effort it reviewed fo- <br />cused on some component of a larger hydrologic system. The compo- <br />nents fit into one of four categories: lakes, rivers, streams, and wet- <br />lands. However, the committee was also acutely aware that each of <br />these entities functions in a larger ecological landscape greatly influ- <br />enced by other components of the hydrologic cycle, including adjacent <br />terrestrial systems. Regrettably, the case histories of restoration attempts <br />that involved this larger ecological landscape were exceedingly rare. <br />After much discussion, the committee finally decided to review <br />restoration case studies in the components of lakes, river and streams, <br />and wetlands because the available literature tended to be compart- <br />mentalized in this way and because it was a convenient and easily <br />understood means of communicating a large body of information. <br />At the same time, the committee believed very strongly that the spa- <br />tial and temporal scope of most restoration efforts was far too small. <br />Moreover, the committee felt that all too many environmental deci- <br />sions, including those involving restoration, had been made in a frag- <br />mented fashion unlikely to produce aself-maintaining aquatic eco- <br />system integrated into the larger ecological landscape. As a result, <br />xi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.