Laserfiche WebLink
PREFACE xiii <br />creative use of ecological information, believing that a good example <br />is more instructive than a bad one. In following this strategy, we <br />also recognized that powerful analytical systems are not substitutes <br />for biological insights or imaginative questioning and hypothesizing. <br />Therefore, we joined the Committee on Applications of Ecological <br />Theory to Environmental Problems in focusing on some important <br />issues concerning restoration techniques. <br />This report does not address the need for reintroducing species in <br />restoration attempts, except to note the need for source pools of spe- <br />cies in each ecoregion. The 1981 National Research Council report <br />Testing for Effects of Chemicals on Ecosystems3 advocated the establish- <br />ment of ecological preserves, although for a different purpose (test <br />species for ecotoxicological procedures including the establishment <br />of microcosms and mesocosms). The need fox such ecological pre- <br />serves as a source of recolonizing species will increase dramatically if <br />the "no-net-loss" policy for wetlands and other aquatic ecosystems is <br />not implemented expeditiously. <br />The committee carried out its tasks through a series of meetings in <br />which the format of the report was decided. Subgroups were formed <br />to draft the various chapters. Restoration case studies were selected <br />by these groups to illustrate points made in each chapter. The com- <br />mittee made four field trips to sites where restoration of aquatic sys- <br />tems had taken place or was going on. Subcommittees made two <br />other site visits. <br />An assignment of this complexity, especially in a newly develop- <br />ing field, requires an exceptional effort on the part of committee members. <br />The linkages among various components of the aquatic ecosystems <br />and the terrestrial system that so strongly affects them are numerous <br />and complex, as are the economic and policy questions related to the <br />restoration process. Committee members worked diligently to sort <br />through an enormous amount of information pertaining to a variety <br />of aquatic ecosystems involving an even wider variety of methods to <br />identify and analyze components critical to restoration efforts. I am <br />much indebted to the subcommittee chairs Patrick Brezonik, Donald <br />Hey, Leonard Shabman, Richard Sparks, James Tripp, Dan Willard, <br />and Joy Zedler, who facilitated the flow of information and the meet- <br />ing of deadlines. Most importantly, their summaries at each com- <br />mittee meeting ensured that the entire committee was aware of the <br />working of these subunits. <br />3National Research Council. 1981. Testing for Effects of Chemicals on Ecosystems. <br />National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. <br />