Laserfiche WebLink
-8- <br />river channel, observation of the deposition <br />resulting from debris flows, and the physical <br />analysis of flow dynamics in rapids are examples of <br />this good work. Integrating these elements into a <br />fuller understanding of sedimentary phenomena was <br />hindered, however, because the modeling study of <br />the sediment and water flow was conducted <br />separately. Also, insufficient attention was paid <br />to sediment source, sinks, and sediment movement to <br />beaches and riparian zones. These elements are now <br />realized to be of central importance because they <br />were the focus of other portions of GCES. <br />Future work by the Department of the Interior <br />should seek to <br />• look for connections between research <br />disciplines in the planning phases of the study <br />• initiate studies of tributary processes <br />because they are the main source of sediment in the <br />Colorado River mainstem <br />• include in future hydrologic research <br />empirical approaches as well as modeling approaches <br />• link sediment studies to biological and <br />hydrological monitoring and research <br />• institute geomorphic studies to supplement the <br />hydraulic studies of the Colorado River system in <br />the Grand Canyon <br />Recreation <br />The committee was well satisfied that the <br />relevant questions in the recreation study were <br />approached given the constraints in the scope of <br />analysis embedded in the design of the GCES <br />research program. The change in recreation value <br />in response to changes in dam operations and in <br />terms of appropriate monetary units of measure was <br />evaluated successfully. The study is notable first <br />for the care that was taken to design a survey <br />research instrument for each of the relevant <br />recreation populations and second for the care with <br />which the statistical inferences were drawn. A <br />