Laserfiche WebLink
-7- <br />phenomena (e.g., sediment erosion and deposition) <br />to terrestrial phenomena (e.g., food of terrestrial <br />vertebrates from the river) and from a confusing <br />mixture of science and value judgment. Although it <br />is often useful to remove references and lengthy <br />explanations from the body of the report, in this <br />instance the text became more confusing because <br />assumptions, values, and facts were not documented, <br />differentiated, and/or explained. Even so, the <br />recommendation made by the researchers to continue <br />the monitoring is significant. Willingness to <br />adjust the flow pattern in response to resource <br />changes is the key to managing the system. <br />The majority of the individual GCES terrestrial <br />biology research projects were carefully executed. <br />The results contribute valuable information. <br />Analysis, however, was limited because some data <br />were missing, numbers were few, and replication was <br />minimal. Many of these problems resulted from <br />unexpected flood conditions during the study <br />period. <br />Future work by the Department of the Interior <br />should seek to <br />• establish links to river productivity in <br />future terrestrial studies <br />• plan for heterogeneity and match methods to <br />the temporal and spatial scales of the phenomena <br />• prepare for the unexpected in schedule and <br />budget preparation; think probabilistically <br />• document the process by which resource values <br />are judged <br />Sediments and Hydrology <br />The sediment and hydrology research effort has <br />produced some excellent new understanding of <br />certain critical components of the complex system <br />of water and sediment movement through the Grand <br />Canyon. The information about mechanisms of sand <br />erosion and deposition in recirculation zones, <br />observations of changes in sediment storage in the <br />