My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9650
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9650
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:35:00 AM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:22:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9650
Author
Mueller, G. A. and e. al.
Title
Factors Influencing Poststocking Dispersal of Razorback Sucker
USFW Year
2003
USFW - Doc Type
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MANAGEMENT BRIEFS <br />Upon reaching the Green and Colorado River con- <br />fluence (54 km), six fish (4 acclimated, 2 control) <br />swam up the Colorado River; 9 (82%) of the 11 <br />fish detected downstream of the confluence were <br />control fish. Moment by the site-acclimated group <br />averaged 66 km (maximum 126 km), whereas con- <br />trols averaged 71 km (maximum 122 km). <br />Large Backwater <br />We followed 58 fish for a month and accounted <br />for 1,121 contacts. Fish dispersed following re- <br />lease, but 21 remained in the backwater for at least <br />1 month. Twenty-two fish (16 pond-reared, 6 flow- <br />conditioned) moved downstream, whereas 6 fish <br />(5 flow-conditioned, 1 pond-reared) went up- <br />stream. Most (95%) fish entering the river were <br />found in small backwaters by the end of week 4. <br />Site-acclimated and reference pond-reared fish dis- <br />persed an average of 8.8 and 6.6 km, respectively, <br />whereas the site-acclimated and reference flow- <br />conditioned groups dispersed 3.6 and 0.2 km. We <br />detected a maximum movement of 49 km down- <br />stream and 9 km upstream by the end of week 4. <br />Average poststocking dispersal from the release <br />point varied among pond-reared fish released in <br />the reservoir (3.7 km, N = 19), small-backwater <br />fish (69.5 km, N = 20), and large-backwater fish <br />(7.6 km, N = 28) (Table 2). A Kruskal-Wallis <br />analysis of the three test groups showed that dis- <br />persal was greatest in fish released from the small <br />backwater (X2 = 39.5, df = 2, P < 0.01). Flow <br />combined with the lack of adequate cover aggra- <br />vated downstream dispersal or drift. <br />We detected no statistical difference in dispersal <br />distance between reference and site-acclimated <br />fish at any release site (Table 2). Acclimation pe- <br />riods of less than 7 d appeared to have negligible <br />influence on short-term dispersal. However, flow- <br />conditioned fish had significantly lower dispersal <br />rates than did pond-reared fish (Wilcoxon two- <br />sample test; Z = -2.298; P = 0.0216, N = 30). <br />Discussion <br />Reintroduction of endangered fish into their his- <br />torical ranges is a relatively recent management <br />tool. Typically, recovery programs use existing <br />conventional culturing and stocking techniques <br />that have served the recreational fishery; however, <br />there is growing evidence that some endangered <br />species are not surviving this reintroduction for- <br />mat. Hatchery-produced fish have been shown to <br />exhibit problems with physical and behavioral <br />stress, disorientation, and occasionally starvation <br />that affects performance and survival (Miller <br />273 <br />1954; Wedemeyer et al. 1990; Hanson and Mar- <br />genau 1992). In contrast, recent research on anad- <br />romous salmonid culturing techniques has shown <br />that innovative hatchery procedures can increase <br />the postrelease survival of smolts (Berejikian et <br />al. 2000; Maynard et al. 1995). <br />Our site-acclimation tests proved inconclusive <br />and possibly were influenced by small sample size <br />or short acclimation period. Previous studies dem- <br />onstrated that handling and transportation stress <br />can alter blood chemistry, behavior, and fish per- <br />formance for days and even weeks (Carmichael et <br />al. 1984a, 1984b; Olla et al. 1995; Waring et al. <br />1996) and that handling or environmentally in- <br />duced stresses are cumulative and can lead to <br />chronic fatigue or death (Wydoski et al. 1976; <br />Schreck 1981; Schister and Bergersen 2000). Site <br />acclimation has become a critical component of <br />many terrestrial reintroduction programs (Fritts et <br />al. 1997; Biggins et al. 1998). <br />The pronounced and prolonged drift (>68 km/ <br />month) witnessed in the small-backwater test on <br />the Green River added to growing evidence that <br />pond-reared fish perform poorly in streams and are <br />prone to downstream drift. Research has shown <br />that initial exposures of pond-reared trout to flow <br />can lead to physiological fatigue (Poston et al. <br />1967; Barton et al. 1986; Clearwater and Pank- <br />hurst 1997). Alternatively, fish exercised for pe- <br />riods beyond 2 weeks exhibited increased stamina, <br />higher food conversions, improved growth rates, <br />better circulation, and greater heart and muscle <br />mass (Cresswell and Williams 1983; Leon 1986; <br />7obling 1994; Davison 1997). Barrett and Mc- <br />Keown (1988) suggested that exercise training not <br />only increased stamina but presumably improved <br />the ability of steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss to <br />avoid or escape predators. Although flow condi- <br />tioning is commonly used in culturing salmonids <br />(Davison 1997), we were unable to find similar <br />approaches for catostomids or other warmwater <br />fish. <br />Our data suggests that razorback suckers con- <br />ditioned to flow 2 months before release remained <br />closer to the release site than pond-reared fish and <br />performed similarly to the wild-captured fish used <br />in earlier telemetry studies (McAda and Wydoski <br />1980; Valdez and Masslich 1989). We propose that <br />flow conditioning improved swimming perfor- <br />mance while reducing overall stress and the chanc- <br />es of chronic fatigue, and we assume that increased <br />performance leads to improved survivability (cf. <br />Barrett and McKeown 1988).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.