Laserfiche WebLink
272 <br />MUELLER ET AL. <br />TABLE l.-Source, rearing conditions, testing conditions, number, length, and weight of razorback suckers used in <br />poststocking dispersal experiments. Sources are as follows: ONFH = Ouray National Fish Hatchery, BCMP = Boulder <br />City Municipal Ponds, and WBNFH = Willow Beach National Fish Hatchery. <br /> Length (mm) Weight (g) <br /> Rearing <br />Source type Test site N Mean Range Mean Range <br />ONFH Pond Reservoir 30 358 335-402 718 610-925 <br />ONFH Pond Small backwater 30 438 394-483 735 520-1,018 <br />BCMP Pond Large backwater 30 357 327-400 474 360-670 <br />WBNFH Raceway Large backwater 30 319 304-346 358 290-460 <br />All surveys were conducted weekly by motor- <br />ized boat or raft. Reservoir tests extended up the <br />San Juan River 15 km and throughout the 95 km <br />of Lake Powell. Surveys for the small-backwater <br />experiment extended from the town of Green Riv- <br />er, Utah, and the confluence of the Colorado and <br />Dolores rivers downstream to Lake Powell, a total <br />distance of nearly 350 km. Limited access to these <br />remote reaches prevented complete coverage on a <br />weekly basis and only, one survey was conducted <br />in Cataract Canyon. Large-backwater surveys <br />were conducted weekly by two survey crews using <br />jet boats. Surveys extended over the 90-km reach <br />of Colorado River between Davis Dam and Lake <br />Havasu. Signal locations were triangulated and co- <br />ordinates determined by global positioning sys- <br />tems (GPS). Distances fish traveled were calcu- <br />lated from GPS coordinates and existing river- <br />reservoir navigational maps (Baars 1987; Fish-n- <br />Maps Company 1991). <br />Experimental procedures were similar for all <br />tests, and fish were tracked for 28 d. Contact was <br />lost for several fish, and data analysis was limited <br />to just those fish we were able to track for a min- <br />imum of 14 d. <br />Results <br />Reservoir <br />Fish were detected 145 times during the first <br />month, and all had left the release site within 5 d. <br />Initial dispersal was rapid, and fish were found <br />along shore and in open water. Within 3-4 d, fish <br />moved toward shore where they were usually <br />(72%) found within 10 m of shore and in vege- <br />tative or rocky cover. Individual behavior was id- <br />iosyncratic; some wandered whereas others be- <br />came sedentary in coves. However, all were found <br />in protective cover during daytime surveys. Over- <br />all movement was minimal (<0.1 km/week) by <br />week 3. Acclimated fish dispersed an average of <br />3.3 km, whereas reference fish dispersed 4.3 km <br />from the release site (Table 2). Maximum dispersal <br />distances were 12.4 for reference fish and 11.1 km <br />for acclimated fish. <br />Small Backwater <br />All study fish left the release site within 5 d, <br />and downstream movement of both groups aver- <br />aged 5 km/d during the first week. Twenty (8 ac- <br />climated and 12 control) fish were detected 2 <br />weeks after release, accounting for 70 contacts. <br />TABLE 2.-Number of and mean and standard deviation of distance moved by razorback suckers under different test <br />conditons; N is the sample size; P-values represent comparisons between control and site-acclimated fish at each location. <br /> <br />Site and test type <br />N Distance <br />Mean <br />SD <br />P <br />Reservoir 0.3599 <br />Control 8 -4.3 2.5 <br />Site-acclimated (2 d) 11 -3.3 2.7 <br />Small backwater 0.9850 <br />Control 12 -68.1 24.9 <br />Site-acclimated (2-3 d) 8 -71.6 33.9 <br />Large backwater, pond reared 0.6472 <br />Control 13 -6.6 8.4 <br />Site-acclimated (2 d) 15 -8.8 11.6 <br />Large backwater, flow conditioned 0.1406 <br />WBNFH/control 15 -0.2 3.3 <br />WBNFH/site-acclimated (7 d) 15 -3.6 6.9