My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9299
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:29:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9299
Author
Anderson, R. and J. Mumma.
Title
Aspinall Studies
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Annual assessment of Colorado Pikeminnow Larval Production in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers, Colorado 1992-1996.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />intermediate flow year, had double the NNC density in the fall surveys than the two low <br />flow years. The fact that the best year for NNC productivity occurred in the intermediate <br />flow year, suggests NNC productivity may be not on a continuum in regard to flow. <br />Increased NNC densities in 1996 could be the result of improved environmental conditions <br />that were independent of flow. <br /> <br />Density estimates for NNC also varied seasonally with highest densities in the fall. <br />Runoff conditions seem to explain the low spring densities in 1993 and 1995. The high <br />spring NNC density in 1995 after the low year of 1994 indicates there can be a large range <br />in variability between years. Since data was not collected in the spring of 1997, it is not <br />known how over-winter mortality would have affected year-class strength of the abundant <br />NNC population identified in the 1996 fall. <br /> <br />Fall NNC densities in backwaters in Reach 2 were higher in the two low flow years <br />than in the two high flow years, but the intermediate flow year (1996) had the lowest <br />density of the period. Trends in NNC abundance were not consistent between Reach 2 <br />(upstream) and Reach 1 (downstream) during the five year study period. If 1996 NNC <br />densities had been intermediate trends in abundance would have been higWy consistent <br />between reaches and with correlated with flow conditions. But flows do not explain why <br />NNC abundance, and resources that determine their abundance, were least in the upstream <br />reach (2) and greatest in the downstream reach (2) during the same year. <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />· The fact that larval Colorado pikeminnow were collected in the lower portion of the <br />15-Mile reach and in the Gunnison River above and below Redlands diversion dam <br />documents that reproduction is occurring in those reaches. <br /> <br />· Colorado pikeminnow larvae appeared earlier in the sample in the low flow years <br />when water temperatures warmer earlier suggesting that water temperature was <br />strongly associated with the initiation of spawning. <br /> <br />· Transport abundance of Colorado pikeminnow larvae was strongly and positively <br />correlated with discharge. The high flow years had the most Colorado pikeminnow <br />larval densities at Loma, and Moab (1995) and Westwater (1993). <br /> <br />· The year (1995) that produced the most native and pikeminnow larvae at Loma had <br />the largest runoff flows, the coldest summer water temperatures and the least number <br />of nonnative larvae. <br /> <br />· The lowest flow year (1994) had the lowest Colorado pikeminnow larval drift density <br />in Westwater and Moab. The lowest drift density in Loma was in 1996 and <br />intermediate flow year. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.