Laserfiche WebLink
<br />28 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />· Drift density for Colorado pikeminnow was inconsistent at Loma between years with <br />similar flow and temperature conditions. The two low flow years (1992 and 1994) <br />did not produce similar numbers of pikeminnow larvae in the drift. Also both native <br />and nonnative larvae numbers were higher in 1992 compared to 1994 suggesting <br />increased carrying capacity for all species in 1992. <br /> <br />· 1992 followed a low runoff flow year (1991), while 1994 followed a high flow year. <br />The occurrence of two low flow years in a row may have contributed to differences <br />observed between 1992 and 1994, but not enough data is available to support a <br />multiple year effect. <br /> <br />· Drift densities for Colorado pikeminnow larvae and for native fish as a group were <br />positively correlated (significant P> 0.05) with each other indicating flow conditions <br />conducive for native larvae production in general was also conducive to production of <br />pikeminnow larvae. <br /> <br />· Transport abundance of nonnative species larvae was in general negatively correlated <br />with discha:ge with the least number of nonnative larvae produced in high flow years. <br /> <br />· The lowest flow year (1994) produced the highest nonnative drift densities at Loma. <br /> <br />· Colorado pikeminnow densities estimates for Lorna and Westwater indicate that <br />Colorado pikeminnow larval densities drop between these locations which does not <br />support assumptions of a progressively increasing downstream drift. <br /> <br />· Correlations for Colorado pikeminnow larval densities between Loma and Westwater <br />and Westwater and Moab were poor, but were fairly good between Loma and Moab. <br /> <br />· Drift density for Colorado pikeminnow was inconsistent between stations in 1996, the <br />intermediate flow year. In 1996 drift density was lowest at Loma, but was high at <br />Westwater and Moab. <br /> <br />· Strong positive correlations between Colorado pikeminnow larval densities in the drift <br />for all sites (Loma, Westwater and Moab) and Colorado pikeminnow YOY sampled in <br />summer and fall seining were not identified. <br /> <br />· Years with increased larval production may have had positive effects on year-class <br />strength prior to inundation of the Colorado River (Lake Powell), but in this study <br />Colorado pikeminnow larval abundance at Loma was not a good predictor of <br />abundance ofYOY in fall samples. <br /> <br />· Non native cyprinid (NNC) densities in fall and spring backwaters were found to be <br />strongly associated with runoff flow conditions with low densities in the high years and <br />high abundance in flow low years. <br />