Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />. ';:f"'l'l! -10:\-' <br /> <br />- <br />(I)"c <br />.... .... <br />cu c <br />... 0 <br />"c E <br />i- <br />e E <br />e>E <br />- <br /> <br />,iii <br />II <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />;;:... ~ <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />q ~ ~~ <br /> <br />!l;qi ;d1~ <br />. 00 ~ ~ .,; ~ <br /> <br />~ ~ <br /> <br />u~ <br />,;,,'-,... ,~... Wj <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />"Il' <br /> <br />'. -~-~ <br />M <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />R ~ <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />B <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o~ <br />~"a' .. I'll' 'I!II~ '.... <br />I <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />'S""-8!: -~~ <br /> <br />150 200 250 300 350 400 450 <br />Bony tail Total Length (mm) <br /> <br />Figure 8. Growth rates ofbonytail (n=31) taken from Cibola High Levee <br />Pond based on 50-mm size groups. Vertical bars depict data ranges and <br />horizontal bars represent a 3 size group rolling average used for smoothing. <br /> <br /> 100% <br />III <br />G,) 80% <br />>< <br />G,)_ ill <br />tJ)~ <br />....~ 60% <br />0 G,) <br />c- <br />o c. <br />.- E 40% <br />'t n:l <br />OtJ) <br />c. 20% <br />0 <br />.. <br />Il. <br /> 0%, <br /> 350 <br /> <br />a z;l __-.... , <br />~~ 9 !J <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />;M-- ~-~. ~,~.Y' <br /> <br />'" :> i 0 Females; <br />~~, ! <br />:f. : I!!I Males <br />~ , <br />,- Il1 ~ i!t ~~"- :~.-..-,~ <br />'''p " <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br /> <br />III <br /> <br />1/1 <br /> <br />375 400 425 450 475 500 <br />Length (mm) (n=82) <br /> <br />Figure 9. Percentage ofbonytail females versus males that were >350 cm taken <br />from Cibola High Levee Pond. <br /> <br />Razorback Sucker-We recaptured substantially more razorback suckers (n=86) than bonytail <br />(n=31). The database contained growth information for 86 suckers that had been recaptured <br />within 9 to 24 months after being marked and released. Growth rates (>6 mm/month) were the <br />largest for smaller fish and declined with size and age (Figure 10). Average growth rate <br />substantially declined for fish >350 mm, dropping to 2.5 mm/month and below. Growth <br />continued for even the largest (<500 mm) suckers, but at the low rate of 0.5 mm/month. <br /> <br />7 <br />