My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9592
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9592
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 5:08:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9592
Author
Mueller, G. A., J. Carpenter and P. C. Marsh.
Title
Cibola High Levee Pond Annual Report 2004.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> 8 <br /> 7 .... . <br /> . . . ~ <br /> 6 . <br />- <br />CI).J::. 5 <br />- - .. . <br />~ l: . . <br />0 4 . <br />.J::.e .. ~ . <br />i- 3 . .... <br />E e 2 . . <br /> . . <br />C) e 1 <br />- . .. <br /> o , , I <br /> 150 250 350 450 550 <br /> Bonytail Total Length (mm) <br /> <br />Figure 7. Growth rates ofbonytail (n=31) captured from Cibola High Levee Pond <br />for the period of record (1993-2004). Data represent fish recaptured between <br />9 to 24 months after initial contact. <br /> <br />Data were grouped into 50-mm size categories and the curve was smoothed using a rolling 3 <br />category average (Figure 8). Growth is typically the most rapid during early life, but <br />interestingly for this community it appeared to peak for the 300-mm size group. Smaller-sized <br />bonytail (<200 mm) exhibited a slightly smaller growth rate of3.5 mm/month, compared to <br />medium-sized (300-400 mm) chub. Growth sharply declined as fish aged and grew in size. <br />Growth for 370 mm bonytail dropped below that measured for smaller fish, and the decline <br />accelerated once fish reach 400 mm. <br /> <br />The retarded growth in the smaller cohort was not expected and would generally not be <br />considered normal for any fish species. In this case, it is quite possible it may represent an <br />artifact of small sample size, measuring error, or possibly marking stress on smaller fish. It is <br />equally possible it reflects differences in growth due to dietary competition among smaH fish and <br />a change in diet of larger fish. <br /> <br />Bonytail are extremely prolific, producing tens of thousands of young annually. Quite possibly, <br />competition for plankton by chub may be aggravated by their high number and by direct <br />competition from the 1,000 adult razorback sucker that share a similar diet. When larger <br />bonytail shift their diet toward larger invertebrates and small fish, there may be a greater <br />abundance of food which in turn improves growth rates. We plan to examine the diet of smaller <br />(<200 mm) bonytail more closely this year: <br /> <br />The largest bonytail were females; several exceeded 500 mm while all males were under 490 <br />mm. There was insufficient data to compare growth rates for both male and females but we <br />suspect that growth for mature females is either accelerated or continued compared to that of <br />mature males. For example, the sex ratio of 350-mm bonytail was l: 1; however, that ratio <br />declined as fish size increased to a point where all fish over 500 mm were females (Figure 9). <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.