Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Size Distribution (%) <br /> <br />j 50 <br />: l! :: <br />i 20 <br />~ 10 <br /> <br /> <br />. ,.;, , <br /> <br />'" <br />'\r- <br /> <br />o , M"T"W" , <br />1~ ,,1' ,,-P 1f? 1J~ # ,g.~ I? ~~ <br /> <br />Total Length (mm) <br />1- 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - * 2004 I <br /> <br />Figure 5. Size distribution of all bonytail captured in Cibola High Levee Pond <br />from 2001 through 2004. Values expressed are a percentage of the total sample. <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />i 50 <br />~ 40 <br />'tl <br />i :: <br /> <br />! 10 <br /> <br />1\ <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />~?' ~ <br />" ~ <br /> <br /> <br />? $ ~ # ~ # ~ # ~ # <br />Total Length (mm) <br />1- 2001 - 2002 - 2003 -><- 2004 I <br /> <br />Figure 6. Size distribution of razorback suckers captured in Cibola High Levee <br />Pond from 2001 through 2004 using all types of sample gear. Values expressed <br />are a percentage of the total sample. <br /> <br />Growth Rates <br /> <br />Bony tail- Growth rates were calculated based on data taken from fish pit-tagged and <br />recaptured a minimum of 9 months and a maximum of 24 months following release. The 9- <br />month minimum allowed us to capture an annual growth season while the maximum standard <br />(24 months) reduced the conservative influence that occurs as fish age. We had information for <br />31 individuals (Figure 7). <br /> <br />5 <br />