My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8020
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:50:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8020
Author
Horak, G. C.
Title
Proceedings of the Symposium on Mitigating Developmental Impacts on Fish and Wildlife.
USFW Year
1979.
USFW - Doc Type
March 1979.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />tional 21 projects and some wildlife data (generally limited in scope) <br />were available from an additional 11 projects. <br /> <br />CASE HISTORY STUDIES <br /> <br />To date, detailed studies of project-related impacts have been completed <br />for 10 specific projects, viz: John Redmond (Kansas); Clark Hill (Geor- <br />gia-South Carolina); Okatibbee ~ississippi); Council Grove (Kansas); <br />Carlyle (Illinois); Keystone (Oklahoma); East Lynn (West Virginia); Lake <br />Sharpe (South Dakota); Ice Harbor (Washington); and Littleville OKassa- <br />chusetts). <br /> <br />Although these projects have been considered to be among the most com- <br /> <br /> <br />pletely docymented Corps projects in the Nation, in terms of fish and <br /> <br /> <br />wildlife studies, comprehensive post~construction inventories of these <br /> <br /> <br />resources and adequate recreational use data had not been compiled at any <br /> <br /> <br />of them until the current st~y. <br /> <br />While some fisheries management has been fmplemented at all 10 projects <br />surveyed, the terrestrial and migratory wildlife communities at 4 out of <br />10 have received almost DO attention because of insufficient funding or <br />habitat suitable for terrestrial wildlife. In instances where management <br />:;J: <br />practices have been applied (substantial in a few situations), these pro- <br />grams have been subsidized by the state conservation agencies (Fish and <br />Wildlife Service in one instance) and not by the federal program respon- <br />sible for reservoir construction and operation. <br /> <br />Impacts on Deer <br /> <br />The accuracy of predicted fmpacts of project construction on fish and <br /> <br />43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.