Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the efficacy of the predictive aspects of the planning reports for selec- <br /> <br />ted Corps reservoirs and to develop specific information upon which to im- <br /> <br /> <br />prove the reliability of these predictions. <br /> <br />The Institute's firs~ step was to identify the necessary number of opera- <br /> <br /> <br />ting Corps projects with adequate fish and wildlife predictions and post- <br /> <br /> <br />impoundment survey data upon which to base an evaluation of adequacy and <br /> <br /> <br />accuracy. The Corps was operating 410 projects at the time of the screen- <br /> <br /> <br />ing process. The initial screening eliminated older projects and projects <br /> <br /> <br />resulting in only minor habitat alteration. After collecting all pre-con- <br /> <br /> <br />struction planning information for the remaining 120 projects, it became <br /> <br /> <br />evident that these data were sufficiently adequate to permit post-~pound- <br /> <br /> <br />ment comparative studies for only 78 projects. The elimination of 42 pro- <br /> <br /> <br />jects or 35 percent of those examined due to the cursory nature of the <br /> <br /> <br />planning documents VBS in itself a significant reflection of the inade- <br /> <br /> <br />quate treatment given to fish and wildlife matters at water development <br /> <br /> <br />projects in the past. <br /> <br />The next activity was to determine the extent and type of impacts wrought <br /> <br /> <br />to fish and wildlife resources in conjunction with the remaining 78 pro- <br /> <br /> <br />jects. The fish and wildlife agency within each state containing one or <br /> <br /> <br />more of the 78 projects was asked to describe the extent of post-construc- <br /> <br /> <br />tion fish and wildlife data. It quickly became evident that very few of <br /> <br /> <br />these projects had received poat-construction follow-up evaluation for <br /> <br /> <br />both fish and wildlife resources. In fact, at 32 projects (411) no.fol- <br /> <br /> <br />low-up data of any consequence were available for either fishery or wild- <br /> <br /> <br />life resources. Only 14 projects had even limited data available for fish <br /> <br /> <br />and wildlife. Post-impoundment fishery data were available from an addi- <br /> <br />42 <br />