My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8071
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:48:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8071
Author
Horn, M. J. and P. C. Marsh.
Title
Production of Razorback Sucker in a Backwater at Yuma Cove, Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada, 1992.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Tempe, Arizona.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4 <br /> <br />The Native Fish Work Group (NFWG) was organized in 1990 to utilize <br />the full potential of the on-site augmentation concept. This <br />multi-agency effort included Arizona Game and Fish Department, <br />Arizona state University, National Park Service, Nevada Division of <br />wildlife (NVDOW), u.s. Bureau of Reclamation (BR), and FWS, with BR <br />providing substantial resources in behalf of the project. The <br />NFWGs goal was to allow razorback suckers to spawn in Yuma Cove, <br />transfer young to another location (Davis Cove, isolated by netting <br />from Lake Mohave and depleted of non-native fishes) for grow-out, <br />then stock 30 cm TL sub-adults into the lake. <br /> <br />The berm between the Yuma Cove backwater and Lake Mohave was built <br /> <br /> <br />up and compacted in winter 1990-91 to preclude breaching even <br /> <br /> <br />during the most severe combination of weather and lake level. At <br /> <br /> <br />the same time the backwater was deepened. Fishes were removed by <br /> <br /> <br />ichthyocide and adult razorback suckers from adj acent spawning <br /> <br /> <br />areas were stocked. Larvae were common and readi ly captured during <br /> <br /> <br />February, March, and April, but were not found in later samples <br /> <br /> <br />losses to unknown causes resulted in unsuccessful production of <br /> <br /> <br />juveniles (NFWG, unpublished data) . <br /> <br />Another attempt was made in 1992. That effort proved successful, <br /> <br />and results constitute the remainder of this report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.