My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8071
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:48:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8071
Author
Horn, M. J. and P. C. Marsh.
Title
Production of Razorback Sucker in a Backwater at Yuma Cove, Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada, 1992.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Tempe, Arizona.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5 <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />The Yuma Cove backwater was stocked on 27-28 January 1992 with ripe <br /> <br />adults (28 females and 60 males) captured from the adjacent Lake <br /> <br />Mohave shoreline (a full report on that operation is available by <br /> <br />request). At the time of stocking, 29% (8) of females and 88% (53) <br /> <br />of males were ripe. <br /> <br />Monitoring commenced in mid-February, and consisted initially of <br /> <br /> <br />sampling using hand-held spotlights, which were known to attract <br /> <br /> <br />the phototactic sucker larvae thereby allowing capture with fine- <br /> <br /> <br />mesh dip nets. Light traps, however, were experimentally shown to <br /> <br /> <br />be more convenient and efficient than spotlights. These traps were <br /> <br /> <br />thus adopted as the standard larval sampling technique (application <br /> <br /> <br />of this method is reviewed by Mueller et al., in preparation). <br /> <br /> <br />Light trapping also revealed an unanticipated density of predatory <br /> <br /> <br />odonate larvae in the backwater, which led to an independent, <br /> <br /> <br />experimental examination of their potential impact on razorback <br /> <br /> <br />sucker recruitment (Horn et al., in preparation). As fish grew, <br /> <br /> <br />seining, entanglement netting, traps, and other techniques were <br /> <br /> <br />variously applied in attempt to collect adequate samples to assess <br /> <br />cohort status. <br /> <br />Fish marking (right pectoral fin clip) to enable population <br /> <br /> <br />abundance estimation was initiated on 16 June and continued until <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.