My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8143
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8143
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:35:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8143
Author
Sousa, R. J., F. P. Meyer and R. A. Schnick.
Title
Better Fishing Through Management\
USFW Year
n.d.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The management of fishery resources is not unlike <br />managing a forest; the only real difference is that we are <br />dealing with water rather than with land. In a forest, if <br />too many mature trees are removed, the seed-producing <br />sources are seriously diminished. If there is not an <br />adequate re-seeding of the forest bed by desirable species, <br />undesirable types of plants will take over. When this <br />occurs, it may be necessary to remove or reduce the <br />unwanted species so that the land can be re-seeded of <br />replanted with the types of trees that are needed or <br />desired. The removal of unwanted tree species can be <br />accomplished by clear-cutting, burning, or the use of <br />herbicides. <br />In fisheries, the removal of too many of the large <br />predators often leads to a reduction in their reproduction <br />This is followed by explosions among populations of <br />forage and non-game fishes. If these species are not <br />controlled, they soon dominate the pond, lake or stream <br />Fishing success declines and other undesirable situations <br />may follow. <br />The first remedial action in such cases is to do <br />supplemental stocking of game fish from hatcheries in <br />hope that they will be able to consume the excess forage, <br />re-establish the needed predator population and, at the <br />same time, provide the desired fishing success. In many <br />instances, however, stocked fish are unable to compete <br />with the excessive numbers of undesired fish already <br />present and they are unable to develop the size and <br />numbers needed to restore desirable "balance" among the <br />fish species. In such situations, managers must resort to <br />more drastic measures. It may be necessary to remove <br />most of the competing fish populations so that stocking <br />can be successful. This is not unlike clear-cutting, <br />burning or herbiciding in forest management so that <br />seedling trees can be planted. <br />Fishery managers have several alternatives they can <br />consider. If the circumstances permit, a pond or lake can <br />be drained to remove the fish. However, in streams and <br />in many lakes, this is not a viable option. The most <br />commonly used approach in these situations is to apply a <br />chemical fish control agent to kill most or all of the <br />existing population and then to restock as soon as <br />possible. Prompt restocking is an important part of <br />re-establishing a good population of game fish. <br />To be acceptable, a fish control agent must work <br />quickly, break down in a short time, and leave no
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.