Selenium in Razorback Sucker
<br />Accumulation of high selenium concentrations in fish gonads
<br />is believed to be the cause of reduced reproduction and subse-
<br />quent species disappearances in Belews Lake, North Carolina
<br />(Cumbie and Van Horn 1978), Hyco Reservoir, North Carolina
<br />(Woock and Summers 1984), and Martin Lake, Texas (Garrett
<br />and Inman 1984; Sorensen 1988). Reports of studies of ele-
<br />vated selenium concentrations in gonads of fish in laboratory
<br />and field studies are presented in Table 2.
<br />Selenium concentrations in fish eggs are apparently due to
<br />transfer from the parent to the egg. Schultz and Hermanutz
<br />(1990) reported 24-h-old eggs from fathead minnows reared in
<br />artificial streams with 10 µg/L selenium for 1 year (i.e., com-
<br />bined waterborne and dietary exposure through food chain)
<br />contained 16 µg/g selenium (reported as 3.91 µg/g wet
<br />weight). In contrast, eggs from reference adults, which con-
<br />tained 1.2 µg/g selenium (reported as 0.31 µg/g wet weight)
<br />before exposure, took up only 0.56 µg/g selenium after expo-
<br />sure for 24 h to 10 µg/L selenium in water, thus indicating
<br />selenium in eggs comes from parental exposure and not expo-
<br />sure of eggs in water with elevated selenium concentrations.
<br />Similarly, Gillespie and Baumann (1986) reported that in 18
<br />artificial crosses of bluegill with high or low selenium concen-
<br />trations in gonads, edema and mortality occurred in larvae from
<br />high-selenium females (even when crossed with reference
<br />males), but not in high-selenium males (when crossed with
<br />reference females). Camlina Power and Light (1984) reported
<br />similar results in artificial crosses of adult bluegill from sele-
<br />nium-impacted Hyco Reservoir and adults from a reference
<br />site. Larvae from Hyco females fertilized with either male type
<br />had abnormal development and 100% mortality prior to
<br />swimup, whereas larvae from reference females fertilized with
<br />either male type had normal development. 'T'hus, selenium in
<br />fish larvae seems to be primarily due to parental transfer in ova
<br />and not milt, with very mirror amounts absorbed during water
<br />exposure prior to hatching. Woock et al. (1987) also showed
<br />exposure of adults to selenium in the diet or to selenium in both
<br />water and diet resulted in significant mortality and deformities
<br />in larvae; unfortunately, no residue data for adults, eggs, milt,
<br />or larvae were reported.
<br />Developing ovaries of fish are adversely affected by sele-
<br />niumexposure. Sorensen (1988) reported that ovaries of redear
<br />sunfish (Lepomis microlophus) from selenium-contaminated
<br />Martin Lake, Texas, contained l7 µg/g selenium (reported as
<br />4.33 µg/g wet weight). I?arly development stages of ovaries of
<br />these fish contained numerous atretic or disintegrated oocytes,
<br />connective tissue hypertrophy, and large areas of necrotic tis-
<br />sue, whereas later oocyte development was asynchronus. Al-
<br />though Sorensen (1988) did not measure selenium concentra-
<br />tions in male gonads of redear sunfish from Martin Lake, she
<br />did report that the testes were small and immature, and had
<br />significantly lower testosterone and ll-ketotestosterone than
<br />males from a reference lake. No selenium-induced alterations
<br />in the morphological appearance of the mature testes were
<br />apparent at the microscopic level (Sorensen 1988). Sorensen et
<br />a[. (1984) found similar abnormalities in ovaries of green sun-
<br />fish (Lepomis cyanellus) collected from selenium-contaminated
<br />Belews Lake, North Carolina, but no abnormalities were found
<br />in testes.
<br />The concentrations of selenium in eggs of razorback suckers
<br />in the present study, although above background concentra-
<br />tions, are less than those in selenium-exposed fish from labora-
<br />tory and field studies where adverse biological effects occurred
<br />199
<br />(Table 2). In these studies, larvae of females with elevated
<br />selenium concentrations had high mortality before the swimup
<br />life stage (Gillespie and Baumann 1986; Hermanutz et al.
<br />1992). in field studies, species disappeared due to adverse
<br />effects on reproduction (Cumbie and Van Horn 1978; Garrett
<br />and Inman 1984).
<br />[n our study, it cannot be stated unequivocally that the above-
<br />normalconcentrations of selenium in eggs of razofiack suckers
<br />are adversely affecting reproductive success. Because of the
<br />very few reproductive studies with fish that have been con-
<br />ducted, the concentration of selenium that can be present in the
<br />egg without causing adverse effects in young has not been
<br />defined and may vary with species. Based on the limited infor-
<br />mation available, the selenium concentration that adversely
<br />affects eggs is somewhere between background concentrations
<br />that cause no adverse effects (2.0-3.1 µg/g) and the concentra-
<br />tions in ovaries currently reported to cause adverse effects in
<br />larvae [ 18 µg/g in bluegill (Hermanutz et al. 1992); 24 µg/g in
<br />fathead minnow (Schultz and Hermanutz 1990)]. Because the
<br />selenium concentrations found in razorback sucker eggs from
<br />the Green River (3.7-10.6 µglg) are within this range, the
<br />effects of selenium on larvae are a concem, and may be ad-
<br />versely affecting razorback sucker reproduction. The three
<br />failed spawns of razorback suckers at the CRI'P laboratory may
<br />be linked to elevated selenium concentrations in the eggs, be-
<br />cause previously hatching attempts were successful.
<br />Most probably none of the eggs in the razorback sucker
<br />collected in 1991 from the Razorback Bar in the Green River
<br />that had 28 µg/g selenium would have resulted in any larvae
<br />surviving. Peitz and Waddell (1991) reported two other endan-
<br />gered fish collected from the Green River had above-back-
<br />gmund selenium concentrations in their gonads. A humpback
<br />chub (Gila cypher) collected in 1986 had 7.3 µg/g selenium,
<br />and a Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius) collected in
<br />1982 had 6.5 µg/g selenium. These elevated selenium concen-
<br />trations are also of concern foc possible adverse reproductive
<br />effects in these species.
<br />Spawning Behavior
<br />Although adults may contain elevated concentrations of sele-
<br />nium, spawning behavior may not be affected. Hermanutz et
<br />al. (1992) reported that, although growth and survival were
<br />reduced in adult bluegill after exposure to 10 µg/L selenium for
<br />258 days in artificial streams, spawning activity was not altered
<br />compared to control fish. Similarly, Pyron and Beitinger (1989)
<br />reported spawning behavior was not affected by exposure of
<br />fathead minnows to 20 or 30 mg/L selenium in water for 24 h
<br />and then allowing them to spawn in water without selenium.
<br />Ogle and Knight (1989) reported no effects on spawning activ-
<br />ities, such as number of spawns per adult pair or number of
<br />eggs per spawn, in fathead minnows fed selenium in the diet for
<br />100+ days. Carolina Power and Light (1984) reported similar
<br />results with adult bluegill from selenium-impacted Hyco Reser-
<br />voir and adults from a reference site exposed to either 20% or
<br />50°k ash pond effluent for up to 2 months; prespawning activity
<br />(nest building) seemed normal, although no young were pro-
<br />duced by Hyco adults.
<br />Based on the above discussion, altered spawning behavior of
<br />razorback suckers in the Green River would not be expected,
<br />and has not been reported (Tyus 1987; Tyus and Karp 1990).
<br />
|