Laserfiche WebLink
Selenium in Razorback Sucker <br />Accumulation of high selenium concentrations in fish gonads <br />is believed to be the cause of reduced reproduction and subse- <br />quent species disappearances in Belews Lake, North Carolina <br />(Cumbie and Van Horn 1978), Hyco Reservoir, North Carolina <br />(Woock and Summers 1984), and Martin Lake, Texas (Garrett <br />and Inman 1984; Sorensen 1988). Reports of studies of ele- <br />vated selenium concentrations in gonads of fish in laboratory <br />and field studies are presented in Table 2. <br />Selenium concentrations in fish eggs are apparently due to <br />transfer from the parent to the egg. Schultz and Hermanutz <br />(1990) reported 24-h-old eggs from fathead minnows reared in <br />artificial streams with 10 µg/L selenium for 1 year (i.e., com- <br />bined waterborne and dietary exposure through food chain) <br />contained 16 µg/g selenium (reported as 3.91 µg/g wet <br />weight). In contrast, eggs from reference adults, which con- <br />tained 1.2 µg/g selenium (reported as 0.31 µg/g wet weight) <br />before exposure, took up only 0.56 µg/g selenium after expo- <br />sure for 24 h to 10 µg/L selenium in water, thus indicating <br />selenium in eggs comes from parental exposure and not expo- <br />sure of eggs in water with elevated selenium concentrations. <br />Similarly, Gillespie and Baumann (1986) reported that in 18 <br />artificial crosses of bluegill with high or low selenium concen- <br />trations in gonads, edema and mortality occurred in larvae from <br />high-selenium females (even when crossed with reference <br />males), but not in high-selenium males (when crossed with <br />reference females). Camlina Power and Light (1984) reported <br />similar results in artificial crosses of adult bluegill from sele- <br />nium-impacted Hyco Reservoir and adults from a reference <br />site. Larvae from Hyco females fertilized with either male type <br />had abnormal development and 100% mortality prior to <br />swimup, whereas larvae from reference females fertilized with <br />either male type had normal development. 'T'hus, selenium in <br />fish larvae seems to be primarily due to parental transfer in ova <br />and not milt, with very mirror amounts absorbed during water <br />exposure prior to hatching. Woock et al. (1987) also showed <br />exposure of adults to selenium in the diet or to selenium in both <br />water and diet resulted in significant mortality and deformities <br />in larvae; unfortunately, no residue data for adults, eggs, milt, <br />or larvae were reported. <br />Developing ovaries of fish are adversely affected by sele- <br />niumexposure. Sorensen (1988) reported that ovaries of redear <br />sunfish (Lepomis microlophus) from selenium-contaminated <br />Martin Lake, Texas, contained l7 µg/g selenium (reported as <br />4.33 µg/g wet weight). I?arly development stages of ovaries of <br />these fish contained numerous atretic or disintegrated oocytes, <br />connective tissue hypertrophy, and large areas of necrotic tis- <br />sue, whereas later oocyte development was asynchronus. Al- <br />though Sorensen (1988) did not measure selenium concentra- <br />tions in male gonads of redear sunfish from Martin Lake, she <br />did report that the testes were small and immature, and had <br />significantly lower testosterone and ll-ketotestosterone than <br />males from a reference lake. No selenium-induced alterations <br />in the morphological appearance of the mature testes were <br />apparent at the microscopic level (Sorensen 1988). Sorensen et <br />a[. (1984) found similar abnormalities in ovaries of green sun- <br />fish (Lepomis cyanellus) collected from selenium-contaminated <br />Belews Lake, North Carolina, but no abnormalities were found <br />in testes. <br />The concentrations of selenium in eggs of razorback suckers <br />in the present study, although above background concentra- <br />tions, are less than those in selenium-exposed fish from labora- <br />tory and field studies where adverse biological effects occurred <br />199 <br />(Table 2). In these studies, larvae of females with elevated <br />selenium concentrations had high mortality before the swimup <br />life stage (Gillespie and Baumann 1986; Hermanutz et al. <br />1992). in field studies, species disappeared due to adverse <br />effects on reproduction (Cumbie and Van Horn 1978; Garrett <br />and Inman 1984). <br />[n our study, it cannot be stated unequivocally that the above- <br />normalconcentrations of selenium in eggs of razofiack suckers <br />are adversely affecting reproductive success. Because of the <br />very few reproductive studies with fish that have been con- <br />ducted, the concentration of selenium that can be present in the <br />egg without causing adverse effects in young has not been <br />defined and may vary with species. Based on the limited infor- <br />mation available, the selenium concentration that adversely <br />affects eggs is somewhere between background concentrations <br />that cause no adverse effects (2.0-3.1 µg/g) and the concentra- <br />tions in ovaries currently reported to cause adverse effects in <br />larvae [ 18 µg/g in bluegill (Hermanutz et al. 1992); 24 µg/g in <br />fathead minnow (Schultz and Hermanutz 1990)]. Because the <br />selenium concentrations found in razorback sucker eggs from <br />the Green River (3.7-10.6 µglg) are within this range, the <br />effects of selenium on larvae are a concem, and may be ad- <br />versely affecting razorback sucker reproduction. The three <br />failed spawns of razorback suckers at the CRI'P laboratory may <br />be linked to elevated selenium concentrations in the eggs, be- <br />cause previously hatching attempts were successful. <br />Most probably none of the eggs in the razorback sucker <br />collected in 1991 from the Razorback Bar in the Green River <br />that had 28 µg/g selenium would have resulted in any larvae <br />surviving. Peitz and Waddell (1991) reported two other endan- <br />gered fish collected from the Green River had above-back- <br />gmund selenium concentrations in their gonads. A humpback <br />chub (Gila cypher) collected in 1986 had 7.3 µg/g selenium, <br />and a Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius) collected in <br />1982 had 6.5 µg/g selenium. These elevated selenium concen- <br />trations are also of concern foc possible adverse reproductive <br />effects in these species. <br />Spawning Behavior <br />Although adults may contain elevated concentrations of sele- <br />nium, spawning behavior may not be affected. Hermanutz et <br />al. (1992) reported that, although growth and survival were <br />reduced in adult bluegill after exposure to 10 µg/L selenium for <br />258 days in artificial streams, spawning activity was not altered <br />compared to control fish. Similarly, Pyron and Beitinger (1989) <br />reported spawning behavior was not affected by exposure of <br />fathead minnows to 20 or 30 mg/L selenium in water for 24 h <br />and then allowing them to spawn in water without selenium. <br />Ogle and Knight (1989) reported no effects on spawning activ- <br />ities, such as number of spawns per adult pair or number of <br />eggs per spawn, in fathead minnows fed selenium in the diet for <br />100+ days. Carolina Power and Light (1984) reported similar <br />results with adult bluegill from selenium-impacted Hyco Reser- <br />voir and adults from a reference site exposed to either 20% or <br />50°k ash pond effluent for up to 2 months; prespawning activity <br />(nest building) seemed normal, although no young were pro- <br />duced by Hyco adults. <br />Based on the above discussion, altered spawning behavior of <br />razorback suckers in the Green River would not be expected, <br />and has not been reported (Tyus 1987; Tyus and Karp 1990). <br />