Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />c ~ <br />_~ <br />a <br />200 <br />Further, elevated selenium concentrations in water at the mouth <br />of Ashley Creek (i.e., 59-78 µg/L; Peltz and Waddell 1991) <br />apparently would not prevent razorback suckers from using the <br />area for prespawning activities because fish, such as fathead <br />minnows, have failed to behaviorally avoid concentrations of <br />selenium that would cause death in 24 h (Watenpaugh and <br />Beitinger 1985). Because adult razorback suckers use the Stew- <br />art Lake outfall and Ashley Creek confluences with the Green <br />River prior to spawning (Tyus 1987) and post-spawning (un- <br />published data, B. Waddell, C. Wiens, and B. Haines, FWS, <br />1991), selenium uptake from both diet and water and deposition <br />in eggs is occurring. <br />Larvae Effects <br />°~~ The effects of pazental transfer of selenium to eggs and the <br />~o ~ resulting larvae are adverse, even though no effects have been <br />reported to occur on fertilization or hatching success. Schultz <br />~~ wand Herirtanutz (1990) reported that ovaries of fathead min- <br />~ ~ Wows reared for 1 year in streams with 10 µg/L selenium (i.e., <br />~ ~ fish were exposed to selenium in water and the food chain) had <br />~ j ~, 24 µg/g selenium (reported as 5.89 µg/g wet weight) compazed <br />~ o to controls with 3.1 µg/g (reported as 0.77 µg/g wet weight); <br />~ ~ v the resulting embryos had l6 µg/g selenium compared to 1.2 <br />~ ~~ µg/g in control fish. The incidence of edema was 25% and <br />lordosis was 23% in selenium-laden 4-day-old fry compared <br />~~ 3~ with 1% edema and 696 lordosis in controls. Likewise, Herma- <br />ZC v nutz et al. (1992) reported that exposure of bluegills to 10 µg/L <br />selenium for 258 days in streams before spawning resulted in <br />~ embryos with significantly lower hatch and larval survival, and <br />c a v increased occurrence of edema. These effects occurred in <br />~p _p~ `~ spawns resulting from ovaries with 18 µg/g selenium. Many of <br />`~'~ ~ the larvae with lordosis and hemorrhaging failed to survive <br />c~ -~ more than 1 day, and those with edema failed to develop prop- <br />erly. Gillespie and Baumann (1986) reported similar effects in <br />progeny of bluegill with 28 µg/g selenium in ovaries. Pyron <br />and Beitinger (1989) reported that nearly alt of the larvae pro- <br />duced by fathead minnows exposed to 20 or 30 mg/L selenium <br />for 24 h had gross morphological abnormalities, particularly <br />edema, and none of the edematous larvae survived longer than <br />7 days post-hatch. <br />in contrast to Hermanutz et al. (1992), Gillespie and Bau- <br />mann (1986) reported that neither percent fertilization nor hatch <br />were different among 18 artificial crosses of bluegills with high <br />or low selenium body burdens. Ogle and Knight (1989) also <br />reported no effect on percent hatch or survival of larvae from <br />adult fathead minnows fed up to 30 µg/g selenium dry weight in <br />the diet for 100+ days before spawning. Their results seem <br />confusing because females had an unrealistically low 10.9 µg/g <br />selenium in ovaries compared to 24 µg/g selenium (reported as <br />5.89 µg/g wet weight) in ovaries of fathead minnow reported <br />by Schultz and Hermanutz (1990) and 18 µg/g selenium (re- <br />ported as 4.4 µg/g wet weight) in ovaries of bluegill reported by <br />Her-manutz et al. (1992). Ogle and Knight (1989) believed the <br />low selenium residues were because their experimental diet <br />contained 75% inorganic selenium (25% organic selenium), <br />which they theorized was less readily taken up in the fish gut. <br />The above-normal selenium concentrations in eggs of razor- <br />back suckers from the Green River in the current study is <br />probably having some adverse effect similar to those described <br />above on the resulting fry. Because of the limited information <br />S. 1. Hamilton and B. Waddell <br />available, it is not possible to predict what those specific effects <br />might be. <br />Muscle Plugs <br />A significant correlation was found between selenium concen- <br />trations in eggs, milt, and muscle plugs collected from the same <br />razorback suckers in this study. For females, the Pearson corre- <br />lation coefficient was 0.99 (p=0.03; n=3) and for males it was <br />0.87 (p=0.05; n=5). Although the number of samples avail- <br />able for the comparison was small because of a very limited <br />number of razorback suckers in the wild, it does-neverthe- <br />less-show that the selenium concentrations in muscle plugs <br />seem to be directly related to the amount of selenium present in <br />eggs and milt of adult razorback suckers. <br />The concentration of selenium in muscle plugs was not sig- <br />nificantly different from that in either eggs or milt (paired <br />t-test), although the amount in muscle plugs was consistently <br />higher than in eggs or milt. These results aze somewhat similar <br />to those of Sager and Cofield (1984), who reported that the <br />concentration of selenium in female gonads of bluegill from <br />Hyco Reservoir, North Carolina, were not significantly differ- <br />ent than in muscle tissue. However, they also reported male <br />gonads of bluegill contained significantly less selenium than <br />did muscle. In contrast, they found female gonads in white <br />catfish (Ictalurus taros) and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) <br />had significantly more selenium than muscle. Cumbie and Van <br />Horn (1978) also reported substantially higher selenium concen- <br />trations in female gonads of bluegill and black bullhead in Belews <br />Lake, North Carolina, than in muscle. Both Hyco Reservoir and <br />Belews Lake Itad been studied extensively and shown to have <br />selenium contaminant problems derived from long-term exposure <br />to low waterborne selenium concentrations (_ =10 µg/L), but in- <br />creasingly higher dietary concentrations at higher trophic levels. <br />Conclusion <br />Eggs, but not milt, of razorback suckers had concentrations of <br />selenium that were above background concentrations in control <br />fish from laboratory studies or reference fish from field studies. <br />The concentrations, however, were below those reported in <br />other species of selenium~xposed fish that had reproductive <br />problems in laboratory studies or field investigations. Never- <br />theless, selenium concentrations in eggs of reproductive razor- <br />backsuckers in the Green River, in our opinion, are sufficiently <br />elevated to suspect reproductive problems that contribute to the <br />decline of this and possibly other endangered fish in the upper <br />Colorado River basin. <br />Acknowledgments. This study was funded in part by the U.S. Bureau <br />of Reclamation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. S. Stephenson <br />and B. Haines are thanked for collecting eggs and milt; B. Haines for <br />information on the fertilized egg study; A. Bullard for the NFCR <br />selenium analyses; and B. Jensen (Dexter NFH, NM) for supplying <br />reference razorback sucker eggs. <br />References <br />Baumann PC, Gillespie RB (1986) Selenium bioaccumulation in go- <br />nads of largemouth bass and bluegill from three power plant cool- <br />ing reservoirs. Environ Toxicol Chem 5:695-701 <br />