Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Final Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-1070, Amendment 3 <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />Other Surveys <br /> <br />Maps of flow patterns within the 1.5-lem study reach were made on 6 dates: May 22, June 11, June 23, and <br /> <br />August 13, 1993; and June 17 and July 16, 1994. Flow patterns of October 28, 1993, were mapped for RM 252.8 to <br /> <br />253.7 (below the 1.5-kIn study reach); flow patterns for RM 256 to RM 257 (upstream from the i.5-lem study reach) <br /> <br />were mapped on October 28, 1993 and July 16, 1994. Mylar or tracing paper overlays were used with the most recent <br /> <br />Reclamation video prints. The main thalweg, shallow and low or no velocity areas were mapped. Particular attention <br /> <br />was given to the location of shear zones that separate the main flow from areas of recirculating or stagnant flow. <br /> <br />Use of Detailed Topography to Develop a <br />Localized Habitat Availability Curve <br /> <br />It would be most desirable to develop a habitat availability relation using data from the entire 10-Ian reach. In <br /> <br />this study, it was necessary to use information from a smaller reach and relate that to the larger 10-Ian reach. Bank- <br /> <br />attached compound bars were the predominate bars within the to-Ian study reach, and consequently, a greater <br /> <br />understanding of the relationship of geomorphic features and habitat availability at these sites was crucial. A localized <br /> <br />version of a habitat availability curve was developed for the bank-attached compound bar within the 1.5-lem reach. <br /> <br />The digitized topographic maps of the detailed bar surveys were interpreted at each topographic level (0.25 m <br /> <br />increments) for areas of available nursery habitat. Using maps of flow patterns and experience gained mapping flow <br /> <br />patterns in this reach, the areas of probable nursery habitat were delineated for each topographic level of the surveyed <br /> <br />bar topography, and surface area of habitat was calculated as a function of stage and discharge. <br /> <br />Analysis of Video Prints <br /> <br />Schmidt (1996, unpublished manuscript) proposed using geomorphic mapping units to systematically measure <br /> <br />habitat complexity and mapped habitat attributes on a series of aerial photos taken in 1963. Differences in complexity <br /> <br />and habitat attributes were related to the characteristics of each river reach. These interpreted photos were digitized <br /> <br />into a GIS, and scaled using USGS quad maps. <br /> <br />Schmidt's (1996, unpublished manuscript) methodology was adapted to compare variation in channel edge <br /> <br />complexity as a function of time and changing discharge, and in order to relate the remotely-sensed measure of <br /> <br />complexity to actual habitat availability. Rather than comparing behavior of alluvial and canyon reaches of the Green <br />