My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7380
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:26:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7380
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Phase II Technical Study Plan Outline
USFW Year
1989.
USFW - Doc Type
Fiscal Year 1989, and Process for Completion of the Technical Studies.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. Directives and Guidelines <br />Inherent in the development of any study plan is the <br />knowledge that there are certain directives and <br />guidelines that dictate the scope and direction of <br />study. The GCES Phase II Environmental Study Plan is <br />no exception. The directives and guidelines used in <br />this plan are as follows: <br />1. The Executive Review Committee agreed, in <br />concept, with the concerns raised in the <br />INTERIM Technical Integration Team memor- <br />andum (Appendix 1, page 4). <br />2. The Executive Review Committee has <br />directed that the environmental technical <br />studies be designed and carried out in <br />such a way as to yield a 1175% Comfort <br />Level" of decision. The level of risk <br />associated with decision-making is a <br />function of the length of time of study, <br />the conditions during the study relative <br />to the entire period of concern, the <br />level of understanding prior to study <br />initiation, and the intensity and quality <br />of effort during the period of study. <br />Risk assessment is the responsibility of <br />scientists who carry out the technical <br />studies, but risk management is the role <br />of policy makers. <br />3. The Executive Review Committee directed <br />that time, dollars, access, and required <br />flows be estimated and the parties <br />responsible for each category of study be <br />identified. <br />4. The attainment of the 75% level of risk <br />requires that the uncertainty (error) in <br />conclusions drawn from results of initial <br />studies must be defined as closely and <br />quantitatively as possible. An assess- <br />ment of the cumulative and interactive <br />uncertainty will also be required. <br />5. In order to achieve a 75% level of risk <br />on certain management decisions, the <br />decisions for which a lower level of risk <br />(an a higher level of certainty) is <br />needed must be presented to the study <br />planning team. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.