Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1995] <br /> <br />MACROINVERTEBRATES OF THE GREEN RIVER <br /> <br />221 <br /> <br />1.00 <br /> <br />0.75 <br />V <br />o <br />B <br />'" <br />is <br />"t:l50 <br />B <br />o <br />:a <br />J: <br /> <br />0.25 <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0.00 <br />0.00 <br /> <br />. ... ...... <br /> <br />. <br />. ... <br />. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />0.25 <br /> <br />0.75 <br /> <br />1.00 <br /> <br />0.50 <br />Original Distance <br /> <br />Fig, 4, Comparison of original dissimilarity matrix and implied matrix from the dendrogram. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />organic matter found in the sediment are pri- <br />mary factors determining which species will <br />be present in a particular area (Brinkhurst and <br />Cook 1974). We identified our specimens only <br />to class level. Oligochaete densities in nonpol- <br />luted lakes are lower than those in organically <br />polluted waters. Densities in Mirror Lake <br />ranged trom 30,000 to 33,000/m2 (Strayer 1985), <br />Jonasson and Thorhauge (1976) reported oligo- <br />chaete densities in Lake Esrom, Denmark, of <br />6000-12,000/m2, Brinkhurst and Cook (1974) <br />found that densities of the three most common <br />tubificids in the more polluted areas of Toronto <br />Harbor ranged from 51,000 to 197,000/m2. <br />Oligochaete densities in nonpolluted lotic sys- <br />tems tend to be lower, Grzybkowska and <br />Witczak (1990) report oligochaete densities in <br />the lower Grabia River, Poland, ranging trom <br />llO to 900/m2, and Palmer (1990) reports den- <br />sities from 5000 to 15,000/m2 in Goose Creek, <br />VA. Densities from polluted lotic systems can <br />approach 200,000/m2 (Koehn and Frank 1980). <br />Oligochaete densities in the seasonally in- <br />undated wetland June sample (87,l50/m2) and <br />river backwater August sample (164,73l!m2) <br />are comparable to values observed in polluted <br />systems described above. Densities from both <br />ephemeral side channel samples (2728 m2 and <br />12,796/m2) and both river channel samples <br />(3426/m2 and ll,182/m2) are comparable to <br />those in Goose Creek (Palmer 1990), In general, <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />oligochaete densities in our study were higher <br />in habitats with the least amount of water flow <br />(seasonally inundated wetland and river back- <br />water habitat types). Terrestrial vegetation <br />invades wetlands during dry periods, and when <br />the water returns the following spring, decaying <br />vegetation forms a rich food base. Backwater <br />habitats retain fine particles, including detri- <br />tus, being transported by the river; as summer <br />progresses, this creates an enriched food base, <br />These factors are the likely reason for the con- <br />vergence oligochaete densities in these two hab- <br />itats with those in organically polluted systems. <br /> <br />Ceratopogonidae <br /> <br />The study of ceratopogonids has mainly <br />centered on adults because of their economic <br />importance (Davies and Walker 1974). Larvae <br />inhabit a variety of habitats including tree <br />holes, leafpacks, and pitcher plants, but are usu- <br />ally most numerous in shallow areas of streams, <br />lakes, and ponds (Bowen 1983). Aquatic forms <br />are mostly predaceous (Merritt and Cummins <br />1984), but several species are mown to consume <br />algae and plant debris (Kwan and Morrison <br />1974). <br />Corkum (1990) investigated streams associ- <br />ated with different land-use types in south- <br />western Ontario and found densities of 501m2 <br />in "forested" sites, 480/m2 in "mixed" sites, <br />and 5300/m2 in "farmland" sites. Adamek and <br />Sukop (1992) found maximum densities of only <br />