Laserfiche WebLink
<br />220 <br /> <br />GREAT BASIN NATURALIST <br /> <br />[Volume 55 <br /> <br />Bray-Curtis Distance <br /> <br />1.00 <br />I <br /> <br />0.75 <br />I <br /> <br />0,50 <br />r <br /> <br />0,25 <br />r <br /> <br />-0,00 <br />r <br /> <br /> <br />Seasonal Werlond - June <br /> <br /> <br />Ri.er Chonnel - July <br /> <br /> <br />Ri.er Channel - August <br /> <br /> <br />Seasonol Werland - July <br /> <br /> <br />River Backwater - August <br /> <br /> <br />Seosonol Werland - August <br /> <br /> <br />Ri.er Backwoler - July <br /> <br /> <br />Side Chonnel - June <br /> <br />Fig. 3. UPG MA cluster analysis of Green River habitat types located in the Ouray National Wildlife Refuge. <br /> <br />Side Chonnel - July <br /> <br />the original Bray-Curtis distances. Ephemeral <br />side channel samples show the greatest simi- <br />larity (least distance), and wetland and back- <br />water sites are more similar to one another. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Nematoda <br /> <br />The importance of free-living nematodes in <br />aquatic systems has not been extensively stud- <br />ied. Aquatic nematodes are known to be micro- <br />botrophic, predaceous, and/or parasitic during <br />one or more of their life stages (Poinar 1991). <br />Due to the scarcity of adequate keys and their <br />small size, nematodes are seldom listed beyond <br />the phylum designation in most studies and <br />may not even be quantified. In studies of aqua- <br />tic systems where nematodes are quantified, <br />highest densities have been found in lakes. <br />Strayer (1985) and Nalepa and Quigley (1983) <br />reported that nematodes comprised 60% and <br />80%, respectively, of all benthic metazoans in <br />Mirror Lake, NH, and in Lake Michigan with <br />means of680,OOO/m2 (Mirror Lake) and 260,000/ <br />m2 (Lake Michigan). In contrast, Palmer (1990) <br />in Goose Creek and Gladden and Smock (1990) <br />on the floodplain of Colliers Creek reported <br />that nematodes comprised a much smaller <br />percentage (6% of total invertebrates) and <br />occurred at diminished densities (1000-15,000/ <br />m2 and 1746/m2, respectively) in lotic systems. <br />In our study nematode density estimates <br />from the seasonally inundated wetland June <br />sample (7133/m2) and the July and August <br />river channel samples (24,881/m2 and 2421/m2, <br />respectively) are comparable to densities pre- <br />viously reported from lotic systems (Gladden <br />and Smock 1990, Palmer 1990). Density esti- <br /> <br />mates for all other sites and dates (54,872- <br />302,603/m2) are more similar to densities in <br />lentic habitats (see above). Greater densities <br />are achieved in the more stable benthic envi- <br />ronments provided by calmer waters and finer <br />sediment particle size. In their study of White <br />Clay Creek, Bott and Kaplan (1989) found that <br />nematode densities were greater in silt than in <br />sand. In our study the highest densities are <br />also associated with a low sand content in the <br />substratum. Low densities reported for the <br />June sample of the seasonally inundated wet- <br />land site reflect the relatively short time that <br />water had been on the sample site. Of the four <br />major invertebrate groups collected in this <br />study, nematodes accounted for 8% of the <br />individuals in the river channel August sample <br />and 98% in the June ephemeral side channel. <br />Nematodes accounted for 67.7% of all organisms <br />observed, Palmer (1990), using a 3.3-cm-dia. <br />core and 44-p.m mesh, reported that nematodes <br />constituted only 4-15% of the Goose Creek <br />community, with a mean of 9%, Her data are <br />similar to our river channel values, High nema- <br />tode densities and their high percentage of the <br />total invertebrates that we report from the <br />ephemeral side channel, river backwater, and <br />seasonally inundated wetland are unusual and <br />should be compared to samples taken at similar <br />locations in this and other large rivers using <br />comparable methods. <br /> <br />Oligochaeta <br /> <br />Freshwater oligochaetes are a well-studied <br />and diverse group found in every type of estu- <br />arine and freshwater habitat. They feed mostly <br />on bacteria living in soft sediments (Brinkhurst <br />and Gelder 1991). The amount and quality of <br /> <br />~ <br />