My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7840
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7840
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7840
Author
Wolz, E. R. and D. K. Schiozawa
Title
Soft Sediment Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities Of The Green River At The Ouray National Wildlife Refuge, Uintah County, Utah
USFW Year
1995
USFW - Doc Type
Great Basin Naturalist
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />220 <br /> <br />GREAT BASIN NATURALIST <br /> <br />[Volume 55 <br /> <br />Bray-Curtis Distance <br /> <br />1.00 <br />I <br /> <br />0.75 <br />I <br /> <br />0,50 <br />r <br /> <br />0,25 <br />r <br /> <br />-0,00 <br />r <br /> <br /> <br />Seasonal Werlond - June <br /> <br /> <br />Ri.er Chonnel - July <br /> <br /> <br />Ri.er Channel - August <br /> <br /> <br />Seasonol Werland - July <br /> <br /> <br />River Backwater - August <br /> <br /> <br />Seosonol Werland - August <br /> <br /> <br />Ri.er Backwoler - July <br /> <br /> <br />Side Chonnel - June <br /> <br />Fig. 3. UPG MA cluster analysis of Green River habitat types located in the Ouray National Wildlife Refuge. <br /> <br />Side Chonnel - July <br /> <br />the original Bray-Curtis distances. Ephemeral <br />side channel samples show the greatest simi- <br />larity (least distance), and wetland and back- <br />water sites are more similar to one another. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Nematoda <br /> <br />The importance of free-living nematodes in <br />aquatic systems has not been extensively stud- <br />ied. Aquatic nematodes are known to be micro- <br />botrophic, predaceous, and/or parasitic during <br />one or more of their life stages (Poinar 1991). <br />Due to the scarcity of adequate keys and their <br />small size, nematodes are seldom listed beyond <br />the phylum designation in most studies and <br />may not even be quantified. In studies of aqua- <br />tic systems where nematodes are quantified, <br />highest densities have been found in lakes. <br />Strayer (1985) and Nalepa and Quigley (1983) <br />reported that nematodes comprised 60% and <br />80%, respectively, of all benthic metazoans in <br />Mirror Lake, NH, and in Lake Michigan with <br />means of680,OOO/m2 (Mirror Lake) and 260,000/ <br />m2 (Lake Michigan). In contrast, Palmer (1990) <br />in Goose Creek and Gladden and Smock (1990) <br />on the floodplain of Colliers Creek reported <br />that nematodes comprised a much smaller <br />percentage (6% of total invertebrates) and <br />occurred at diminished densities (1000-15,000/ <br />m2 and 1746/m2, respectively) in lotic systems. <br />In our study nematode density estimates <br />from the seasonally inundated wetland June <br />sample (7133/m2) and the July and August <br />river channel samples (24,881/m2 and 2421/m2, <br />respectively) are comparable to densities pre- <br />viously reported from lotic systems (Gladden <br />and Smock 1990, Palmer 1990). Density esti- <br /> <br />mates for all other sites and dates (54,872- <br />302,603/m2) are more similar to densities in <br />lentic habitats (see above). Greater densities <br />are achieved in the more stable benthic envi- <br />ronments provided by calmer waters and finer <br />sediment particle size. In their study of White <br />Clay Creek, Bott and Kaplan (1989) found that <br />nematode densities were greater in silt than in <br />sand. In our study the highest densities are <br />also associated with a low sand content in the <br />substratum. Low densities reported for the <br />June sample of the seasonally inundated wet- <br />land site reflect the relatively short time that <br />water had been on the sample site. Of the four <br />major invertebrate groups collected in this <br />study, nematodes accounted for 8% of the <br />individuals in the river channel August sample <br />and 98% in the June ephemeral side channel. <br />Nematodes accounted for 67.7% of all organisms <br />observed, Palmer (1990), using a 3.3-cm-dia. <br />core and 44-p.m mesh, reported that nematodes <br />constituted only 4-15% of the Goose Creek <br />community, with a mean of 9%, Her data are <br />similar to our river channel values, High nema- <br />tode densities and their high percentage of the <br />total invertebrates that we report from the <br />ephemeral side channel, river backwater, and <br />seasonally inundated wetland are unusual and <br />should be compared to samples taken at similar <br />locations in this and other large rivers using <br />comparable methods. <br /> <br />Oligochaeta <br /> <br />Freshwater oligochaetes are a well-studied <br />and diverse group found in every type of estu- <br />arine and freshwater habitat. They feed mostly <br />on bacteria living in soft sediments (Brinkhurst <br />and Gelder 1991). The amount and quality of <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.