My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7818
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 1:33:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7818
Author
Stalnaker, C. B. and P. B. Holden
Title
Changes In Native Fish Distribution In The Green River System, Utah-Colorado
USFW Year
1973
USFW - Doc Type
Utah Academy Proceedings
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />ST!.LNAKF;R. HOLDEN; NATIVE FISH DISTRIDUTION <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />The Colorado squaw fish was reported to be common in both the lower <br />and upper Colorado River basins and attained weights in excess of 50 <br />pounds (Gilbert and Scofield, 1898; Jordan, 1891). Jordan and Evermann <br />(1934) indicated that it was common in the Green River as far north as lhe <br />~own of Green River, Wyoming. Dy the middle of rhe 20th century the <br />Iistribution and abundance were rapidly becoming reduced (Miller, 1961). <br />lut prior to the completion of Flaming Gorge Dam, numerous squawfish <br />vere taken in the reservoir basin and just below the damsite and young <br />quawfish were common in Dinosaur National Monument walers late in <br />962 (UF & G personnel). <br />The round tail chub was reported to be common throughout lhe upper <br />'olorado drainage by early collectors. Miller (J 96 I) believed it was de- <br />[easing in abundance due to nwn's modification of rivers. Ii is still readily <br />)Ilected in most parts of its range and is somewhat successful in reservoir <br />lvironments. <br />The. bony tail chub likewise was reported to be common throughout the <br />)lorado drainage presumably in the large rivers and their major tribu. <br />ries. J~ Was considered a subspecies of G. robusla until the late 1960s <br />(olden and Stalnaker, 1970) and was fairly abundant in Dinosaur Na. <br />mal Monument area through the early 1960s. <br />The humpback chub was previously reported from the canyon areas of <br />rthem Arizona (Grand anti Glcn Canyons) and the canyon areas of <br />10saur National Monumcnt (Miller, 1946, 1963). Apparently it was <br />'cr very common in the u~'pcr ~'olorado River basin. <br />The humpback sucker was commonly taken by early collectors <br />'ermann and RUller, 1895). Jordan (1891) reported it very common, <br />ng used by local residents for food. It was common in the lower Co10- <br />o niver reservoirs in the 1950s (Douglas, 1952; Jonez and Sumner, <br />4). At.:cording to Hubbs :ml! Miller (1953) it Was uncommon and <br />f>ming scarce in the upper Colorado basin. It was rare in the Green <br />n in preiinpoundment 1960s (Dosley, 1960; Dinns, 1965) and was <br />lrted to be rare in Dinosaur National Monumemby Hagen (1962) <br />ngpreimpoundment collecting. <br />'he blue head sucker was commonly found throughout most of the <br />'rado River drainage and was reponed to be common in preimpound. <br />(surveys of the Green River (McDonald and Dotson, 1960; Banks, <br />I). Two forms of this species are found in the Green River system; a <br />JW peduncled form and a wide peduncled form. <br />i,l e..~.flannclmouth sucker has been reported to be abundant throughog. t <br />7olorado River system and to' be the most common of the large river <br />enous species, making up the greatest percentage of total fish <br />a".. _ <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />.....-: <br />.--' <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />'\ <br />\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.