Laserfiche WebLink
<br />....... <br /> <br />GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF COLORADO SQUAWFiSH <br /> <br />691 <br /> <br />TABLE I.-Estimated mean total lengths (TL) and mean annual growth increments by age for age-0-7 Colorado <br />squawfish in the Colorado River. Mean length at hatching is from Snyder (1981). Mean TL at age I is from measured <br />fish assumed to be I year old that were seined near river kilometer 87 (measured from the mouth of the Green River) <br />on 28 June 1989. Mean lengths of fish age 2-7 are from measurements of fish aged by scales. Insufficient captures of <br />age-2 fish precluded estimates of increments for ages 1-2 and 2-3. Increments for fish age 7-8 were not calculated <br />because presumptive age-8 fish were not reliably aged. <br /> <br /> Growth Annual growth <br />Age Total length (mm) period increment (mm) <br />(years) N Mean Range SD (age) Mean SD <br />0 8 7.7 7.0-8.5 0.5 0-1 63.5 13.6 <br />I 73 71.2 50-103 13.6 1-2 <br />2 I 181.0 2-3 <br />3 3 232.7 190-259 37.3 3-4 82.0 56.0 <br />4 6 314.7 267-374 41.8 4-5 61.5 53.4 <br />5 19 376.2 326-453 33.3 5-6 47.9 45.3 <br />6 10 424.1 375-472 30.6 6-7 32.2 36.6 <br />7 7 456.3 430-479 20.0 <br /> <br />ble age distribution for constant survival rate s was <br />calculated as <br /> <br />Ni = Ni-I'S.(l - g), <br /> <br />where Ni is the relative number of fish of age i <br />and g is the annual rate of population growth. Sim- <br />ulations were conducted to select lengths for each <br />age from age-length distributions. Lengths were <br />randomly selected for 10,000 fish of each age, and <br />the number of fish in I-mm increments calculated <br />by weighting the relative number in each age-class. <br />Survival rates for which measured distributions <br />did not differ significantly (Kolmogorov-Smirnov <br /> <br />TABLE 2.-Estimated annual growth increments for Col- <br />orado squawfish 400 rom total length (TL) and longer in <br />the Colorado River. Mean increments are from measured <br />changes in length of recaptured fish. Length-class is of fish <br />at first capture. Mean growth increments with a letter in <br />common are not significantly different (ANOV A, F = <br />13.63; df = 7, 119; P < 0.00001; Fisher's least significant <br />difference, P < 0.05). A combined average increment for <br />fish 550-899 mm TL is also shown because mean incre- <br />ments among these sizes were not statistically different. <br /> <br />Length- Growth age i to <br />class age i + I (rnm) <br />at age i <br />(mm) N Mean Range SD <br />400-449 6 42.7w 28-52 8.1 <br />450-499 17 30.1 x 5-68 18.9 <br />500-549 24 19.8 Y 4-54 13.7 <br />550-599 32 9.5 z 0-31 8.2 <br />600-649 21 8.7 z 0-24 7.5 <br />650-699 10 12.5 zy 3-24 7.9 <br />700-749 6 14.0 zy 7-22 5.6 <br />750-799 3 10.4 z 5-15 4.9 <br />800-849 3 2.7 z 0-5 2.5 <br />850-899 5 5.1 z 2-8 2.4 <br />550-899 80 9.5 0-31 7.5 <br /> <br />[K-S] one-sample test, P > 0.05) from stable <br />length distributions were considered "suitable" <br />estimates. <br />Tests of assumptions.-Statistical tests were <br />conducted to assess whether observed population <br />structure of fish 550 mm and longer was consistent <br />with the assumptions listed above. Comparisons <br />between TL distributions in each year (1982, and <br />1991-1995) were made with the K-S two-sample <br />test to assess constancy of age structure between <br />years (see Figure 2). Stability in age structure <br />would be consistent with constant recruitment into <br />the youngest age-class of fish 550 mm and longer <br />and constant survival among years and over ages <br />and lengths. We compared length distributions of <br />fish captured with trammel nets with fish that were <br />electrofished (K-S two-sample test) to determine <br />if all data could be used. We also used annual <br />trammel-net catch rates of Colorado squaw fish 550 <br />mm and longer to assess (ANOV A) if abundance <br />was relatively stable (i.e., g = 0) during 1991- <br />1994. Though effort among net sets was unequal, <br />average effort was assumed equal among years. <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />Growth and Age <br /> <br />Growth of Colorado squaw fish in the Colorado <br />River was relatively rapid through about age 10, <br />when fish averaged approximately 550 mm TL <br />(Tables 1, 2). Our estimates of mean lengths by <br />age were similar to reports by others, but only <br />through age 10 (Figure 3). Our estimate of mean <br />age for fish 600 mm was 15 years; 700 mm, 25 <br />years; 800 mm, 32 years. Rate of growth slowed <br />,ftenge 10, >!though.. inurea.ein mte may OW" ~ <br />when fi.h = betweeo 650 ..d gOO mm; beyond j <br />