Laserfiche WebLink
<br />......- <br />692 <br /> 1000 <br /> 900 <br /> 800 <br />- 700 <br />E <br />E 600 <br />- <br />.r::. <br />- <br />Q) 500 <br />c <br />~ 400 <br />(ij <br />- <br />~ 300 <br /> 200 <br /> 100 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> <br />OSMUNDSON ET AL. <br /> <br />fffff!!fttttftttffttft! <br />-' fttt <br />,. ttt <br />,.' ttt <br />" ttt <br />I ,/ tttt <br />l.f't t t <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />20 25 30 35 <br /> <br />Age (years) <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />45 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />55 <br /> <br />FIGURE 3.-Estimated mean length by age for Colorado squaw fish in the Colorado River. Lengths calculated by <br />four methods (see Tables ], 2). Bars represent :t 1 SE. For ages where lengths were calculated by adding mean <br />increments to mean lengths of the preceding age (ages 8-55), SE was calculated assuming a linear combination <br />of mean increments. Additional Jines are growth curves reported by others: solid, Seethaler (1978) for the Colorado <br />River; dash, Hawkins (1992) for the Colorado River; dot-dash, Hawkins (1992) for four rivers combined. <br /> <br />800 mm, growth appears to slow (Table 2). Dif- <br />ferences in mean annual growth increments among <br />all size-classes greater than 550 mm were, how- <br />ever, not statistically significant. Rate differences <br />among years (1991-1995) were not present in fish <br />345 mm or longer (ANCOV A, F = 0.34, df = 4, <br />71, P = 0.85). Relationships between growth in <br />one year and subsequent years was not indicated <br />for fish 400 mm or longer (X2 = 0.024, df = 1, P <br />= 0.88), i.e., most fish did not consistently grow <br />more or less than the average. <br />Simulated length distributions produced mean <br />lengths by age similar to those derived by adding <br />mean increments (Figure 3) and indicate an ex- <br />pected range of variation by age (Figure 4a). <br />Growth increments were log-normal within size- <br />classes, and simulations used log-transformed <br />growth rates. When growth was assumed constant <br />for fish 550 mm and longer, the rate was steady, <br />as expected, but variance in lengths for a given <br />age was greater than when calculated increments <br />were used (Figure 4b). Twenty simulations that <br />used different random-number sequences pro- <br />duced nearly identical distributions by age. <br />Simulations indicated broad ranges of age for <br />~ fi,h of ,;mil" length,_ "p<'Cially roc fi,h 550 mm <br />lond long" (Figore 5a). lodividoa!. may tak, <br /> <br />10-22 (mean = 15) years to reach 600 mm; 16- <br />30 (mean = 25) years to reach 700 mm; and 20- <br />40 (mean = 32) years to reach 800 mm. Similar, <br />but even more variable, ages were indicated for a <br />given TL when growth of fish 550 mm and longer <br />was assumed constant (Figure 5b). <br /> <br />Survival <br />Tests of assumptions.-No significant differ- <br />ences (P > 0.05) existed among years in the TL <br />distributions of fish 550 mm or longer captured in <br />the upper reach 1991-1994 (N = 34, 41, 49, 34, <br />respectively). Similarly, no significant differences <br />(P > 0.05) were present between TL distributions <br />for those years and for 1990 (N = 15) and 1995 <br />(N = 44) under different sampling regimes. The <br />TL distribution of 1982 fish (N = 41) was signif- <br />icantly different from 1992 (P = 0.028), but was <br />not (P > 0.05) for all other years (1990-1995), <br />suggesting essential stability during the period. <br />Catch rates, expressed as number of Colorado <br />squawfish 550 mm on longer per net set, were <br />compared for the period 1991-l994 (number of <br />sets = 139, 117, 121, 105, respectively). No sig- <br />nificant differences existed among years (Kruskal- <br />Wallis one-way ANOV A, X2 = 1.916, df = 3, P <br />= 0.590). <br />