My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8161
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8161
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 11:05:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8161
Author
Osmundson, D. B., R. J. Ryel and T. E. Mourning.
Title
Growth and Survival of Colorado Squawfish in the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />690 <br /> <br />OSMUNDSON ET AL. <br /> <br />dom-number sequences. Mean and variance of <br />7-year-old fish as determined by scales was used <br />to generate an initial size distribution. For a sim- <br />ulated population of 103 fish in each age, lengths <br />at each age were calculated based upon simulated <br />distributions of sizes in the previous age-class. <br />Range of ages expected for given lengths was also <br />calculated from these simulations. <br />To aid in constructing growth simulations, sta- <br />tistical tests were conducted to determine if growth <br />in one year was related to growth the following <br />year (i.e., whether individual fish consistently <br />grew more than the average) and whether mean <br />growth in some years was greater than in other <br />years. Contingency table analysis was conducted <br />with fish captured in multiple years to test the re- <br />lationship of individual growth between years. We <br />used analysis of covariance (initial length as co- <br />variate) to test for differences among years for <br />1991-1995. <br /> <br />Survival <br />Estimates.-Survival rates were estimated for <br />Colorado squawfish 550 mm and longer. We as- <br />sumed that survival rates of juveniles and suba- <br />dults were probably different from adults but had <br />no way of assessing them. Estimates were limited <br />to upper-reach adults (Figure 1) because longitu- <br />dinal variation in size distributions, coupled with <br />unequal sampling effort between reaches, could <br />have biased whole-river length distributions. The <br />estimates were limited to fish 550 mm and longer <br />because Seethaler (1978) reported immature fish <br />as large as 503 mm TL. Estimates were made with <br />a modified Chapman-Robson approach (Seber <br />1982), in which survival is based on declining <br />numbers of individuals by age in the population. <br />Because captured fish were not reliably aged, <br />survival estimates were made by comparing <br />lengths of captured fish with theoretical length dis- <br />tributions under the following assumptions (con- <br />sistent with Ricker 1975): (1) survival rate is uni- <br />form with age over the range of ages examined; <br />(2) survival rate is uniform over time and does not <br />vary among years; (3) recruitment to the first size <br />examined is equal among years; and (4) the sample <br />is uniformly drawn from all ages-lengths consid- <br />ered (i.e., there is no effect of gear selectivity). <br />Theoretical length distributions (termed stable <br />length distributions) were calculated from age dis- <br />tributions, assuming constant survival rates and <br />constant recruitment into the youngest age-class <br />(termed stable age distributions), and the gener- <br />ated age-length distributions (Figure 2). The sta- <br /> <br />- <br />*' <br />- <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />>- <br />o <br />C <br />0> <br />:J <br />C- <br />O> <br />L. <br />U. <br /> <br /> <br />Age (years) <br /> <br />- <br />E <br />E <br />- <br /> <br />B <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />+oJ <br />0) <br />C <br />0> <br />CCS <br />+oJ <br />t2 <br /> <br />1ttH <br />t <br /> <br />Age (years) <br /> <br />- <br />*' <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />>- <br />o <br />C <br />0> <br />:J <br />c- <br />O> <br />L. <br />U. <br /> <br />Length (mm) <br /> <br />FIGURE 2.-Calculation of stable length distribution <br />(C) from stable age distribution (A) and age-length dis- <br />tribution (B). The stable age distribution assumes a con- <br />stant survival rate and rate of recruitment into the youn- <br />gest age-class. Age-length distributions are calculated <br />from distributions of growth increments based on total <br />length. The stable length distribution was calculated by <br />using relative number of fish for each length as deter- <br />mined by age-length frequency distribution and relative <br />number of fish by age. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.