Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3. Recent projects in which restoration of some component(s) of natural flow regimes has occurred or been proposed <br />for specific ecological benefits. <br />Location Flow component(s) Ecological purpose(s) Reference <br />Trinity River, CA Mimic timing and magnitude of peak Rejuvenate in-channel gravel habitats; restore <br />riparian succession; provide migration <br />earl Barinaga 1996, <br /> flow y <br />flows for juvenile salmon <br />Truckee River, CA Mimic timing, magnitude, and duration Restore riparian trees, especially cottonwoods Klotz and Swanson 1997 <br /> of peak flow, and its rate of change <br /> during recession <br />Owens River, CA Increase base flows; partially restore Restore riparian vegetation and habitat for <br />e fishes and non-native brown trout <br />ti Hill and Plaits in <br />press <br /> overbank flows v <br />na <br />Rush Creek, CA (and other Increase minimum flows Restore riparian vegetation and habitat for <br />waterfowl and non-native fishes LADWP 1995 <br />tributaries to Mono Lake) <br />Oldman River and tributaries, Increase summer flows; reduce rates of <br />southern Alberta, Canada Rows stage decline; mimic natural <br />flows in wet years <br />Green River, UT Mimic timing and duration of peak flow <br />and duration and timing of nonpeak <br />flows; reduce rapid baseflow fluctu- <br />ations from hydropower generation <br />San Juan River, UT/NM <br />Gunnison River, CO <br />Rio Grande River, NM <br />Pecos River, NM <br />Colorado River, AZ <br />na <br />ey <br />Ily <br />by <br />ns <br />re- <br />ms <br />.ed <br />an <br />)se <br />ids <br />on <br />In <br />ta, <br />w- <br />ng <br />of <br />Bey <br />A <br />ng <br />on <br />nia <br />sh- <br />)n- <br />Restore riparian vegetation (cottonwoods) Rood et al. 1995 <br />and cold-water (trout) fisheries <br />Recovery of endangered fish species; enhance Stanford 1994 <br />other native fishes <br />Mimic magnitude, timing, and duration Recovery of endangered fish species <br />of peak flow; restore low winter <br />baseflows <br />Mimic magnitude, timing, and duration Recovery of endangered fish species <br />of peak flow; mimic duration and timing <br />of nonpeak flows <br />Mimic timing and duration of flood- <br />plain inundation <br />Regulate duration and magnitude of <br />summer irrigation releases to mimic <br />spawning flow "spikes"; maintain <br />minimum flows <br />Mimic magnitude and timing <br />Bill Williams River, AZ Mimic natural flood peak timing <br />(proposed) and duration <br />Pemigewasset River, NH Reduce frequency (i.e., to no more <br /> than natural frequency) of high flows <br /> during summer low-flow season; reduce <br /> rate of change between low and high <br /> flows during hydropower cycles <br />Roanoke River, VA Restore more natural patterning of <br /> monthly flows in spring; reduce rate of <br /> change between low and high flows <br /> during hydropower cycles <br />Ecosystem processes (e.g., nitrogen flux, <br />microbial activity, litter decomposition) <br />Determine spawning and habitat needs <br />for threatened fish species <br />Restore habitat for endangered fish species <br />and scour riparian zone <br />Promote establishment of native trees <br />Enhance native Atlantic salmon recovery <br />Increased reproduction of striped bass <br />Kissimmee River, FL Mimic magnitude, duration, rate of Restore floodplain inundation to recover <br />change, and timing of high- and low- wetland functions; reestablish in-channel <br />flow periods habitats for fish and other aquatic species <br />•J. Polos, 1997, personal communication. US Fish & Wildlife Service, Arcata, CA. <br />bF. Pfeifer, 1997, personal communication. US Fish & Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, CO. <br />wood trees (Klotz and Swanson <br />1997). <br />Recent approaches to <br />streamflow management <br />Methods to estimate environmental <br />flow requirements for rivers focus <br />primarily on one or a few species <br />that live in the wetted river channel. <br />Most of these methods have the nar- <br />row intent of establishing minimum <br />allowable flows. The simplest make <br />use of easily analyzed flow data, of <br />assumptions about the regional simi- <br />larity of rivers, and of professional <br />b <br />b <br />Molles et al. 1995 <br />Robertson 1997 <br />Collier et al. 1997 <br />USCOE 1996 <br />FERC 1995 <br />Rulifson and Manooch <br />1993 <br />Toth 1995 <br />opinions of the minimal flow needs <br />for certain fish species (e.g., Larson <br />1981). <br />A more sophisticated assessment <br />of how changes in river flow affect <br />aquatic habitat is provided by the <br />Instream Flow Incremental Method- <br />ology (IFIM; Bovee and Milhous <br />779 <br />11 December 1997