hill cranes (Gnus canadensis), which
<br />made the Platte River famous, have
<br />abandoned river segments that have
<br />narrowed the most (Krapu et al. 1984).
<br />Changes in the duration of flow
<br />conditions also have significant bio-
<br />logical consequences. Riparian plant
<br />species respond dramatically to chan-
<br />nel dewatering, which occurs fre-
<br />quently in and regions due to surface
<br />water diversion and groundwater
<br />pumping. These biological and eco-
<br />logical responses range from altered
<br />leaf morphology to total loss of ri-
<br />parian vegetation cover (Table 2).
<br />Changes in duration of inundation,
<br />independent of changes in annual
<br />volume of flow, can alter the abun-
<br />dance of plant cover types (Auble et
<br />al. 1994). For example, increased
<br />duration of inundation has contrib-
<br />uted to the conversion of grassland
<br />to forest along a regulated Austra-
<br />lian river (Bren 1992). For aquatic
<br />species, prolonged flows of particu-
<br />lar levels can also be damaging. In
<br />the regulated Pecos River of New
<br />Mexico, artificially prolonged high
<br />summer flows for irrigation displace
<br />the floating eggs of the threatened
<br />Pecos bluntnose shiner (Notropis sinius
<br />pecosensis) into unfavorable habitat,
<br />where none survive (Robertson in
<br />press).
<br />Modification of natural flow tim-
<br />ing, or predictability, can affect
<br />aquatic organisms both directly and
<br />indirectly. For example, some native
<br />fishes in Norway use seasonal flow
<br />peaks as a cue for egg hatching, and
<br />river regulation that eliminates these
<br />peaks can directly reduce local popu-
<br />lation sizes of these species (Nxsje et
<br />al. 1995). Furthermore, entire food
<br />webs, not just single species, may be
<br />modified by altered flow timing. In
<br />regulated rivers of northern Califor-
<br />nia, the seasonal shifting of scouring
<br />flows from winter to summer indi-
<br />rectly reduces the growth rate of juve-
<br />nile steelhead trout (Oncorhyncus
<br />mykiss) by increasing the relative
<br />abundance of predator-resistant in-
<br />vertebrates that divert energy away
<br />from the food chain leading to trout
<br />(Wootton et al. 1996). In unregu-
<br />lated rivers, high winter flows re-
<br />duce these predator-resistant insects
<br />and favor species that are more pal-
<br />atable to fish.
<br />Riparian plant species are also
<br />strongly affected by altered flow tim-
<br />1750LPrior to 1776, widespread beaver dams naturally control streamflow: dams gradually disappear as beavers are hunted
<br />to near extinction; mill dams replace beaver dams as territory is settled.
<br />1824 - Creation of Arty Corps of Engineers. with task of keeping rivers navigable: federal government begins support
<br />of commercial navigation on the Mississippi.
<br />1825 - Completion of Erie Canal, creating transport route from the Hudson River to the Great Lakes.
<br />1849. 1850, 1860 - Swamp Land Acts. transferring 65 million acres of wetlands in 15 states from federal to state
<br />administration for purpose of drainage:. 1850 Act gives Everglades to Florida.
<br />1880'5 - ditching and draining of wetlands in tributaries to the Mississippi River begins.
<br />1900
<br />1901 - canal built from Colorado River to Salton Sink and the Imperial Valley is bom. Foods of 19W-1905 create
<br />Salton Sea, and the river is put back in its original channel.
<br />1902 - Reclamation Project Act. establishing Reclamation Service to 'nationalize the works of irrigation'.
<br />1920 - Federal Power Act authorizes licensing of non-federal hydropower dams.
<br />1925 1927 - Mississippi River floods, proving existing levees inadequate and leading to 1928 Flood Control Act
<br />1928 - Colorado River Compaq ratified. partitioning the river's water
<br />1933 - Tennessee Valley Autlprily Act passed, and nation embarks on rust multipurpose project for controlling and
<br />using a river.
<br />1935 - Hoover Dam dedicated by FOR.
<br />7930.1940 - U.S. Amry Corps constructs 9-Foot Channel Project, turning upper Mississippi into an inbacondnental
<br />channel.
<br />1940 - channel straightening of tributaries to the Mississippi River begins.
<br />1944 - Flood Control Act auftnzes federal participation in flood control projects. and establishes recreation as a full
<br />purpose for flood control projects.
<br />1950 1953 - building of flood control dams begins on the Mississippi River. 750 miles channelized upstream from mouth.
<br />1954 - Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, begins active Soil Conservation Service involvement in helping
<br />farmers to channelize streams.
<br />1963 - Glen Canyon Dam completed: 1964 - U.S. and Canada ratify Columbia River Treaty, 1965 - California State
<br />Water Project approved.
<br />F1968 -Wild and Scenic Rivers Act passed to preserve certain rivers in "free4lomng condition'.
<br />19751 1978 - PURPA passed. providing market for small-scale hydropower generation.
<br />1986 - Electric Consumers Protection Act - amends Federal Power Act. requires FERC to give equal consideration to
<br />power generation potential and fish, wildlife, recreation, and other aspects of environmental quality during dam
<br />licensing/relicensing.
<br />1992 - legislation approved for federal purchase and removal of 2 private dams on the Elwha River, to restore fish
<br />passage.
<br />1993 - major food on Mississippi River causes extensive damage.
<br />2000 1996 - Controlled flood of Colorado River at Grand Canyon: restoration of Everglades begins.
<br />Figure S. A brief history of flow alteration in the United States.
<br />ing (Table 2). A shift in timing of
<br />peak flows from spring to summer,
<br />as often occurs when reservoirs are
<br />managed to supply irrigation water,
<br />has prevented reestablishment of the
<br />Fremont cottonwood (Populus
<br />fremontii), the dominant plant spe-
<br />cies in Arizona, because flow peaks
<br />now occur after, rather than before,
<br />its germination period (Fenner et al.
<br />1985). Non-native plant species with
<br />less specific germination require-
<br />ments may benefit from changes in
<br />flood timing. For example, salt
<br />cedar's (Tamarix sp.) long seed dis-
<br />persal period allows it to establish
<br />after floods occurring any time during
<br />the growing season, contributing to its
<br />abundance on floodplains of the west-
<br />ern United States (Horton 1977).
<br />Altering the rate of change in flow
<br />can negatively affect both aquatic
<br />and riparian species. As mentioned
<br />above, loss of natural flashiness
<br />threatens most of the native fish fauna
<br />of the American Southwest (Minckley
<br />and Deacon 1991), and artificially
<br />increased rates of change caused by
<br />peaking power hydroelectric dams
<br />on historically less flashy rivers cre-
<br />ates numerous ecological problems
<br />(Table 2; Petts 1984). A modified
<br />rate of change can devastate riparian
<br />species, such as cottonwoods, whose
<br />successful seedling growth depends
<br />on the rate of groundwater recession
<br />following floodplain inundation. In
<br />the St. Mary River in Alberta,
<br />Canada, for example, rapid draw-
<br />downs of river stage during spring
<br />have prevented the recruitment of
<br />young trees (Rood and Mahoney
<br />1990). Such effects can be reversed,
<br />however. Restoration of the spring
<br />flood and its natural, slow recession
<br />in the Truckee River in California
<br />has allowed the successful establish-
<br />ment of a new generation of cotton-
<br />778 BioScience Vol. 47 No. 11
|