Laserfiche WebLink
hill cranes (Gnus canadensis), which <br />made the Platte River famous, have <br />abandoned river segments that have <br />narrowed the most (Krapu et al. 1984). <br />Changes in the duration of flow <br />conditions also have significant bio- <br />logical consequences. Riparian plant <br />species respond dramatically to chan- <br />nel dewatering, which occurs fre- <br />quently in and regions due to surface <br />water diversion and groundwater <br />pumping. These biological and eco- <br />logical responses range from altered <br />leaf morphology to total loss of ri- <br />parian vegetation cover (Table 2). <br />Changes in duration of inundation, <br />independent of changes in annual <br />volume of flow, can alter the abun- <br />dance of plant cover types (Auble et <br />al. 1994). For example, increased <br />duration of inundation has contrib- <br />uted to the conversion of grassland <br />to forest along a regulated Austra- <br />lian river (Bren 1992). For aquatic <br />species, prolonged flows of particu- <br />lar levels can also be damaging. In <br />the regulated Pecos River of New <br />Mexico, artificially prolonged high <br />summer flows for irrigation displace <br />the floating eggs of the threatened <br />Pecos bluntnose shiner (Notropis sinius <br />pecosensis) into unfavorable habitat, <br />where none survive (Robertson in <br />press). <br />Modification of natural flow tim- <br />ing, or predictability, can affect <br />aquatic organisms both directly and <br />indirectly. For example, some native <br />fishes in Norway use seasonal flow <br />peaks as a cue for egg hatching, and <br />river regulation that eliminates these <br />peaks can directly reduce local popu- <br />lation sizes of these species (Nxsje et <br />al. 1995). Furthermore, entire food <br />webs, not just single species, may be <br />modified by altered flow timing. In <br />regulated rivers of northern Califor- <br />nia, the seasonal shifting of scouring <br />flows from winter to summer indi- <br />rectly reduces the growth rate of juve- <br />nile steelhead trout (Oncorhyncus <br />mykiss) by increasing the relative <br />abundance of predator-resistant in- <br />vertebrates that divert energy away <br />from the food chain leading to trout <br />(Wootton et al. 1996). In unregu- <br />lated rivers, high winter flows re- <br />duce these predator-resistant insects <br />and favor species that are more pal- <br />atable to fish. <br />Riparian plant species are also <br />strongly affected by altered flow tim- <br />1750LPrior to 1776, widespread beaver dams naturally control streamflow: dams gradually disappear as beavers are hunted <br />to near extinction; mill dams replace beaver dams as territory is settled. <br />1824 - Creation of Arty Corps of Engineers. with task of keeping rivers navigable: federal government begins support <br />of commercial navigation on the Mississippi. <br />1825 - Completion of Erie Canal, creating transport route from the Hudson River to the Great Lakes. <br />1849. 1850, 1860 - Swamp Land Acts. transferring 65 million acres of wetlands in 15 states from federal to state <br />administration for purpose of drainage:. 1850 Act gives Everglades to Florida. <br />1880'5 - ditching and draining of wetlands in tributaries to the Mississippi River begins. <br />1900 <br />1901 - canal built from Colorado River to Salton Sink and the Imperial Valley is bom. Foods of 19W-1905 create <br />Salton Sea, and the river is put back in its original channel. <br />1902 - Reclamation Project Act. establishing Reclamation Service to 'nationalize the works of irrigation'. <br />1920 - Federal Power Act authorizes licensing of non-federal hydropower dams. <br />1925 1927 - Mississippi River floods, proving existing levees inadequate and leading to 1928 Flood Control Act <br />1928 - Colorado River Compaq ratified. partitioning the river's water <br />1933 - Tennessee Valley Autlprily Act passed, and nation embarks on rust multipurpose project for controlling and <br />using a river. <br />1935 - Hoover Dam dedicated by FOR. <br />7930.1940 - U.S. Amry Corps constructs 9-Foot Channel Project, turning upper Mississippi into an inbacondnental <br />channel. <br />1940 - channel straightening of tributaries to the Mississippi River begins. <br />1944 - Flood Control Act auftnzes federal participation in flood control projects. and establishes recreation as a full <br />purpose for flood control projects. <br />1950 1953 - building of flood control dams begins on the Mississippi River. 750 miles channelized upstream from mouth. <br />1954 - Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, begins active Soil Conservation Service involvement in helping <br />farmers to channelize streams. <br />1963 - Glen Canyon Dam completed: 1964 - U.S. and Canada ratify Columbia River Treaty, 1965 - California State <br />Water Project approved. <br />F1968 -Wild and Scenic Rivers Act passed to preserve certain rivers in "free4lomng condition'. <br />19751 1978 - PURPA passed. providing market for small-scale hydropower generation. <br />1986 - Electric Consumers Protection Act - amends Federal Power Act. requires FERC to give equal consideration to <br />power generation potential and fish, wildlife, recreation, and other aspects of environmental quality during dam <br />licensing/relicensing. <br />1992 - legislation approved for federal purchase and removal of 2 private dams on the Elwha River, to restore fish <br />passage. <br />1993 - major food on Mississippi River causes extensive damage. <br />2000 1996 - Controlled flood of Colorado River at Grand Canyon: restoration of Everglades begins. <br />Figure S. A brief history of flow alteration in the United States. <br />ing (Table 2). A shift in timing of <br />peak flows from spring to summer, <br />as often occurs when reservoirs are <br />managed to supply irrigation water, <br />has prevented reestablishment of the <br />Fremont cottonwood (Populus <br />fremontii), the dominant plant spe- <br />cies in Arizona, because flow peaks <br />now occur after, rather than before, <br />its germination period (Fenner et al. <br />1985). Non-native plant species with <br />less specific germination require- <br />ments may benefit from changes in <br />flood timing. For example, salt <br />cedar's (Tamarix sp.) long seed dis- <br />persal period allows it to establish <br />after floods occurring any time during <br />the growing season, contributing to its <br />abundance on floodplains of the west- <br />ern United States (Horton 1977). <br />Altering the rate of change in flow <br />can negatively affect both aquatic <br />and riparian species. As mentioned <br />above, loss of natural flashiness <br />threatens most of the native fish fauna <br />of the American Southwest (Minckley <br />and Deacon 1991), and artificially <br />increased rates of change caused by <br />peaking power hydroelectric dams <br />on historically less flashy rivers cre- <br />ates numerous ecological problems <br />(Table 2; Petts 1984). A modified <br />rate of change can devastate riparian <br />species, such as cottonwoods, whose <br />successful seedling growth depends <br />on the rate of groundwater recession <br />following floodplain inundation. In <br />the St. Mary River in Alberta, <br />Canada, for example, rapid draw- <br />downs of river stage during spring <br />have prevented the recruitment of <br />young trees (Rood and Mahoney <br />1990). Such effects can be reversed, <br />however. Restoration of the spring <br />flood and its natural, slow recession <br />in the Truckee River in California <br />has allowed the successful establish- <br />ment of a new generation of cotton- <br />778 BioScience Vol. 47 No. 11