My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9582
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9582
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement - Navajo Reservoir Operations Volume III Comments and Responses.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction - Durango, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Volume III - Comments and Responses <br />FEIS - Navajo Reservoir Operations <br />1. General comments are listed first, and responses are provided after each general <br />comment. These are comments /responses that address issues raised by a number <br />of commentors and are addressed in common to (1) highlight issues important to <br />significant numbers of people/entities and (2) avoid repetition. <br />2. Individual letters and transcripts follow the general comments /responses and <br />are arranged in sections as listed below. Each of the sections is preceded by an <br />introduction that lists the total number of letters included in that section and major <br />concerns expressed (measured by the number of respondents citing particular <br />issues). <br />? Cooperating Agencies <br />? States <br />? Local Governments <br />? Water /Irrigation Districts <br />? Industry/Business <br />? Environmental Organizations <br />? Other Organizations <br />? Individuals <br />? Anglers <br />? Transcripts <br />? Form Letters <br />3. The general and individual comments/ responses sections are followed by a <br />section citing letters requiring no response. These include letters simply <br />expressing support or nonsupport or offering opinions or containing advice not <br />pertinent to the DEIS. These letters are acknowledged, but written responses are <br />not included. <br />Summary of Issues <br />Those who commented on the Navajo Reservoir Operations DEIS cited issues in at least <br />30 general areas. Overall, however, as shown in this volume, issues raised repeatedly <br />during the public comment period tended to focus in the main areas summarized below: <br />? Alternatives formulation and selection, including use of the No Action Alternative <br />as the project baseline, a perceived limited range of minimum/maximum <br />flows, alleged preselection of the Preferred Alternative, and other issues. A <br />preponderance of respondents cited this as a concern, often in connection with a <br />desire to implement the 500/5000 Alternative to maintain the existing trout <br />fishery. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />i <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />i <br />• <br />• <br />•
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.