Laserfiche WebLink
<br />60 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />flood, and much of the gain in sand at high <br />elevations will be temporary. <br /> <br />The floods of 1983 and 1984 caused loss of <br />area of camping beaches, especially in narrow <br />reaches. Because this loss occurred even <br />after the system had had almost 20 years to <br />store sand for resupply of beaches, we <br />conclude that floods occurring more than once <br />in 20 years will cause even greater loss of <br />beaches unless delivery of. sand from <br />tributaries is exceptionally high. <br /> <br />(3) Flood flows may be required to move very <br />coarse debris brought to the river by flows <br />in tributaries. A large tributary debris <br />flow, such as that which created Crystal <br />Rapid in 1966, could make navigation very <br />hazardous. LcLrge annual floods of the <br />pre-dam period adjusted these deposits, eas- <br />ing the constriction at rapids and making <br />them more navigable. The size and frequency <br />of flows needed to remove large, newly added <br />debris are not known. Evidence suggests that <br />flows of 90,000-300,000 cfs may be required <br />to maintain rapids at their pre-dam condition <br />of navigability. These flows may very well <br />be above the limits of releases that would <br />ever be made as part of planned operations at <br />Glen Canyon Dam. <br />