Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION VII: MODIFIED OPERATIONS <br /> <br />In this chapter we describe five ways in which the <br />operations of Glen Canyon Dam could be modified to <br />protect or enhance environmental and recreational <br />resources. Each of these. modified water release <br />scenarios addresses one key environmental or <br />recreational resource. All five scenarios eliminate <br />flood' releases and reduce or eliminate fluctuating <br />releases, the adverse consequences of which were de- <br />tailed in the previous chapter. These scenarios only <br />approximate ideal release patterns for downstream <br />resources. They illustrate the types of changes that <br />could be ,made to protect or enhance resources, but do <br />not represent the full range of possible options and <br />should not be considered as fully developed or <br />recommended operational plans. <br /> <br />The critical resources targeted for each scenario are: <br /> <br />(1) Humpback chub <br />(2) Common native fish <br />(3 ) Trout <br />(4) Beaches, terrestrial vegetation, and wildlife <br />(5) Fishing and white-water recreation <br /> <br />We combined resources that respond similarly to flows <br />or that can be protected or enhanc~d within the same <br />pattern of annual releases. Two additional modifica- <br />tions to current operations are addressed here: <br />mimicking pre-dam releases to simulate "natural" .flows <br />and increasing the peak powerplant capacity from 31,500 <br />cfs to 33,100 cfs. <br /> <br />Each scenario is represented here (see Figures VII-1 to <br />VII-6) as an annual release pattern showing monthly <br />releases.. Except where noted, the release levels shown <br />are steady releases. In recognition of the variability <br />of the annual runoff, each scenario has been developed <br />in two versions: a "high-water year" version that pro- <br />vides roughly 16 maf of release, and a "low-water year" <br />version which provides roughly 8 maf of release. <br /> <br />Scenarios for each resource were developed around the <br />sensitive periods in lifestage or use patterns shown in <br />Table VI-1. The rationale for these release patterns <br />is presented in the impacts analysis below and de- <br />tailed in Appendices A-C. For each scenario, we <br />describe the benefit that results for the targeted <br />resource and also impacts to the other critical <br />resources ,when the scenario is compared to currrent <br /> <br />61 <br />