My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7423
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7423
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:44:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7423
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Draft Report, September 1987.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Washington, D.C.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />because the supply of sediment is severely reduced and <br />is highly erratic. Floods may also irreversibly impact <br />the vegetation by leaching nutrients from the soil <br />(Appendix B, Section V) Nutrient-poor soil could <br />limit productivity, change the species composition of <br />riparian vegetation, and lead to loss of wildlife <br />habitat and a decrease in the diversity and abundance <br />of plants and animals. . <br /> <br />Although some potential benefits of infrequent flood <br />releases have been hypothesized, it appears. that the <br />detrimental effects of even rare floods (1 in 20 years) <br />outweigh potential benefits. We have had only a short <br />time to monitor the response of the system to floods, <br />and therefore have very little idea of how the system <br />responds to a given frequency of floods. However, <br />based on evidence of irreversible damage from the 1983 <br />flood, which occurred after 20 years without floods, we <br />conclude that floods occurring more frequently than <br />once in 20 years will result in loss of critical re- <br />sources without substantial benefits. These potential <br />benefits are discussed below. <br /> <br />(1) As vegetation ages and becomes more <br />homogeneous, the diversity of animals that <br />depend on vegetation is often reduced. <br />Infrequent flooding may open areas for <br />colonization by younger individuals of the <br />same plant species or different species, thus <br />increasing vegetation habitat diversity, and <br />in turn increasing ~nimal diversity. The <br />frequency of flooding that would enhance <br />diversity is not known at the present time. <br />We know from this study that diversity within <br />the animal community along the river was <br />increasing from 1963 to 1982, a twenty-year <br />period of operations with almost no flood <br />releases, we do not know how long plant and <br />,animal diversity would have continued to <br />increase or whether the flood in 1983 will <br />increase or decrease diversity in the long <br />term. <br /> <br />(2) If sand is in sufficient supply in and <br />along the river, floods can move sand from <br />low elevations to high elevations where it is <br />more useful for campsites. Redistribution of <br />sand during floods cleans it of refuse and <br />scours away any encroaching vegetation which <br />may make camping more difficult. However, <br />overall beach area will be lost during any <br /> <br />59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.