Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Example 1: <br />Family A3 <br />Q 7F7B016035 <br />Cf 7F713025474 <br />Family A7I <br />Q 7F7DIE243D <br />Both <br />K-A* mMDH-A I <br />FF RF <br />FF RF <br />CK-A* mMDH-A 1 * <br />FF RF <br />C 7F7D22643A FF RF <br />Example 2: <br />Buth <br />Family C71 mI H-A <br />Q 7F7DIE2B7B RR' <br />C 7F7D 17223E RR' <br />INHS <br />K-A* mMDH-AI* <br />1:0.375=F 1:1.000=R <br />2:0.625 = R 2:0.000 = F <br />CK-A* mMDI i-A 1 * <br />1:0.875=F 1:1.000=R <br />2:0.125=R 2:0.000=F <br />INNS <br />IDHP-A * <br />1:1.000 <br />2:0.000 <br />Family B2 mI DH-A IDHP-A* <br />Q 7F7D7C372B RR" 1:1.000 <br />7F713026029 RR 2:0.000 <br />These results indicate either a problem in scoring these loci (and we are certain about our <br />scoring, because we re-checked things) or a mixup in family lots. <br />To test the alternatives, the hatchery lots were resampled in Colorado and we <br />reanalyzed the new fish. Our results were similar to our original analysis for Family A3, but not <br />exactly similar for Family A7I: <br />Family Family CK-A* 1:0.750 1:1.000 <br />2: 0.250 2:0.000 <br />m-MDH-A 1" 1:1.000 1:1.000 <br />2:0.000 2:0.000 <br />5