My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7273
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 9:51:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7273
Author
Prewitt, C. G., E. J. Wick and D. E. Snyder.
Title
Population and Habitat Monitoring Program for the Endangered Humpback Chub (
USFW Year
1978.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. <br />Colorado River - Middle of the Black Rocks area in Ruby Canyon <br />(immediately below fish collection site F). This reach is <br />unique and does not represent other portions of the canyon above <br />or below Black Rocks. Numerous squawfish and humpback chubs <br />have been captured in this exceptionally deep area (Sealing, <br />et al. 1975). <br />METHODS <br />Aquatic habitat within the trend zones was assessed in two distinct <br />ways. First, a float trip was conducted through each trend zone and general <br />geomorphologic,land use and riverine features noted. This procedure allowed <br />detailed visual assessment of areas and activities which might change in scale <br />or nature such as irrigation, gravel mining, mechanical stream channel changes, <br />road maintenance, grazing, bankside stabilization or urban development. Also, <br />the general vegetative covEr on alluvial islands and both streaw banks was <br />characterized by density and type. Stream depths were measured continuously <br />during float trips, and notations made of areas providing especially deep or <br />critically shallow waters. Very shallow areas were marked for possible future <br />assessment by single-cross section instream flow methodologies such as that <br />used by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. <br />All observations made during float trips were recorded on Xerox copies <br />of topographic maps (Fig. 2-6) and each trend zone was further documented <br />with color slides (Appendix C). <br />The second habitat assessment technique involved the measurement of <br />certain representative river reaches within all but one trend zone by standard <br />river-channel surveying methods. At each "habitat measurement area" five <br />channel cross-sections and their water surface elevations were surveyed. <br />. Each cross-section contained a minimum of nine segments in which substrate
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.