Laserfiche WebLink
~ r ~V ~ <br />o Construction of instream flow structures or ladders to increase <br />habitat availability. <br />o Funding of continued research based on the fishes' need-for recovery. <br />o Investigation of the possibility and value of creating a hatchery. <br />Alternative H Pro's <br />o The plan could provide a framework for mitigation measures to be <br />required under various Section 7 reviews. This would provide the <br />opportunity to assure that mitigation measures complement each other <br />leading toward efficient resolution of the overall problem. <br />Alternative B Con's <br />o None discussed. <br />CQNSERVAT I 4N f IJtVD I NG <br />A number of different alternatives were discussed as a source of funds to <br />support continuing research #or conservation measures. The source discussed <br />could be utilized for recovery as well as c~servation measures. The <br />discussion involved "brain-storming" sources with little or no evaluation. <br />Potential sources of funding are: <br />o "Winding Gap" payments. <br />o Surtax on fishing and hunting license fees. <br />o Provide a percentage of CRSP power revenues. <br />o Provide State funding in proportion to water a3lotments under <br />interstate compacts. <br />o States provide assistance. <br />o FWS provide own funding. <br />o Congressional appropriation. <br /> <br />59 <br />