Laserfiche WebLink
~ ~. <br />Alternative C Pro's <br />o Infringement on State water law or interstate compacts would be <br />eliminated. <br />Alternative C Con's <br />o As discussed in Alternative A, the need far any replacement water at <br />all is arguable. _. <br />o Cost of available water will increase. Cost will be borne by people. <br />LONG-TERM IMPLEMENTATION OF ESA SEGTI4N 7 <br />Common to any alternative for long-term implementation is the Head for further <br />study. More field data are required to develop the necessary tools to define <br />impact and conservation measures. <br />Alternative A <br />One approach would be continuation of the current practice of requiring "Windy <br />Gap" payments and defining conservation measures on a case basis for each <br />Section 7 review. <br />Alternative A Pro's <br />The discussion for Short-Term Alternative A applies. <br />Alternative A Con's <br />The discussion for Short-Term Alternative A applies. <br />Alternative B <br />Develop a plan_to implement the recovery of the listed fishes. This could <br />involve definition of locations in the river System where fish populations <br />should be established and then taking steps to establish such populations. <br />Such steps could include: <br />o Purchase of specific storage for release for instream needs. <br />o Construction of reregulatory dams to control flows at optimum levels. <br />o Construction of temperature-modification structures on reservoirs to <br />increase habitat suitability (such as Glen Ganyon). . <br />58 <br />