Laserfiche WebLink
temporal, or behavioral integrity from other randomly breeding groups of <br />that same species (Kutkuhn 1981). This stock definition applies to multiple <br />stocks within an individual river or a single stock comprising fish from <br />various rivers within a basin (Philipp et al. 1993). The biological <br />uniqueness resulting from isolation or geographic separation is an <br />evolutionary one and such stocks have been referred to as "evolutionary <br />significant units" (Dizon et al. 1992). <br />Criteria considered to identify and characterize fish stocks include: <br />distribution and abundance, spawning, migration, and genetic information <br />Dizon et al. 1992, Ihssen et al. 1981). Spawning behavior and physiology <br />may be important to survival in a particular environment (Larkin 1981). The <br />criteria used to identify and characterize endangered and candidate fish <br />stocks will be: <br />Geographic Distribution and Abundance. The basic criterion used to <br />separate fish stocks are distribution and abundance of each species. <br />Some disjunct stocks are geographically separated from others and do not <br />appear to exhibit interchange between them. For example, the humpback <br />chub is found as relatively small concentrations of fish that are widely <br />separated and confined to short reaches of deep canyon areas (Valdez and <br />Clemmer 1982; Tyus and Karp 1989: Tyus and Karp 1991). <br />2. Identified or Suspected Spawning Sites. Spawning sites and time of <br />spawning must be determined. This will be accomplished by collecting <br />ripe fish in specific river reaches, and, for some species, collecting <br />of larval fishes downstream from documented or suspected spawning sites. <br />In the Upper Colorado River Basin all major tributaries have been <br />sampled to determine the distribution and abundance of endemic and <br />introduced fishes (Bestgen 1990; McAda et al. 1993: Miller et al. 1982: <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1990a, 1990b, 1991). Additional work of <br />this type needs to be done in the other major river systems in Region 6. <br />3. Migration. Movement and Interchange between Stocks. Some endangered and <br />candidate fishes are known to migrate to specific spawning areas but <br />return to a home area during the remainder of the year. The Colorado <br />squawfish migrates long distances to spawning sites and is considered <br />the most mobile of the endangered Colorado River fishes (Tyus 1991). <br />The razorback sucker exhibits moderate migrational movements (Tyus and <br />Karp 1991). Some humpback chub stocks (e.g., the stocks in Black Rocks <br />and Westwater Canyons in the Colorado River) do not migrate for spawning <br />(Kaeding et al. 1990) but a lower basin humpback chub stock spawns in <br />the Little Colorado River and uses the mainstem Colorado River in the <br />Grand Canyon during the remainder of the year (Kaeding and Zimmerman <br />1983). The greenback cutthroat trout returns to a specific spawning <br />site. <br />Dams have fragmented habitat preventing free movement of fishes. <br />Therefore, some of the geographic separation among stocks is due to <br />altered habitats. In most cases, fish are known to move between <br />different river reaches during the spawning season. A small amount of <br />interchange among stocks is a natural phenomenon that provides for