My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8249
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/17/2009 11:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8249
Author
Modde, T., W. J. Miller and R. Anderson.
Title
Determination of Habitat Availability, Habitat Use, and Flow Needs of Endangered Fished in the Yampa River Between August and October.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Project #CAP-9,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND and APPROACH <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The Yampa River is the largest tributary in the Upper Colorado River Basin with a relatively natural <br />hydro graph and approximate historical flow magnitude (Tyus and Karp 1989). Yampa River flows are <br />highly variable annually with spring runoff peaks greater, and summer baseflows lower than the Green <br />River into which it empties (USGS records). Self sustaining populations of endangered Colorado <br />pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius (Tyus 1990) and one of five known endangered humpback chub Gila <br />cypha populations (Karp and Tyus 1990) reside in the Yampa River. In addition, this river contains one of <br />only two documented spawning sites of both Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker Xyrauchen <br />texanus (Tyus and Karp 1990). Because most Colorado pikeminnow spawned in the Yampa River drift <br />downstream to nursery sites in the Uintah Basin, these offspring are important in defining pikeminnow <br />recruitment in the Middle Green, White, and Yampa rivers. Despite, or because of, highly variable <br />environmental conditions, native fishes are more abundant than nonnative fishes in the lower Yampa <br />River (Modde and Smith 1995). <br /> <br />Water management recommendations for endangered fishes in the Yampa River began with interim flow <br />recommendations proposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 1990 (USFWS 1990a). The interim <br />recommendation emphasized the need for a natural hydro graph that preserved spring peak flows, but <br />recommended that baseflows not fall below 50% exceedance flow. The 1990 interim recommendation <br />was modified by Modde and Smith (1995) who reiterated that high spring peaks are needed for channel <br />and habitat maintenance, and fish spawning cues, but recommended variable baseflows ranging between <br />20% and 80% exceedance flows based on the magnitude of the annual hydrograph. Following the <br />modified interim flow recommendations, the Colorado Water Conservation Board filed for a water right <br />to protect the instream flow habitat of endangered fish in the Yampa River (Case numbers 95CWl56 and <br />95CW 155, filed December 28, 1995). Since these water rights will be junior to existing rights, they will <br />only influence future water development. Existing instream flows in the Yampa River appear to be <br />adequate to maintain stable populations of Colorado pikeminnow and humpback chub (Tyus and Karp <br />1989). However, in some years, for example 1994, stream flows can be very low (approx. 10 cfs, USGS <br />records). The frequency and duration of low flow periods may increase with continued water <br />development until the state of Colorado develops its full allotment in accordance with the Upper Colorado <br />River Compact agreement. Currently, estimated depletion of water from the Yampa River is <br />approximately 110,000 acre-feet and is forecasted to be as much as 159,000 acre-feet by the year 2040 <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.