Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(Hydrosphere 1995). Because future depletions would be evenly distributed throughout the year and there <br />is limited existing capacity to store spring runoff waters, the impacts of depletions would likely be <br />greatest during low-flow periods of the year, exacerbating potential low-flow impacts on fish during the <br />months of August through October. <br /> <br />I f the anticipated frequency of low in stream flows do not provide adequate protection of endangered fish, <br />it is incumbent upon the Recovery Implementation Program for the Recovery of the Endangered Fishes of <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin (RIP) to provide alternatives that promote recovery of affected listed <br />species. Several options exist to provide adequate low flow protection including purchasing and <br />converting existing senior water rights to in stream flow rights, and developing water storage to augment <br />flows during the low flow period. In an effort to address the future water development and recovery <br />options for endangered fishes in the Yampa Valley, the RIP initiated the Yampa River Basin Endangered <br />Fish Recovery and Water Management Plan. The goal ofthis plan is "to provide water for existing and <br />future human needs, to provide and protect the in stream flows and habitat needed to maintain and recover <br />the endangered fishes, [and] to protect other native fish and wildlife resources in the Yampa River Basin." <br /> <br />As a part of the NEP A process in developing the water management plan, this study was initiated to <br />define low flow needs (i.e., August through October) of the endangered fishes in the Yampa River for use <br />by the Yampa River Management team. Whereas the previous interim flow recommendations (USFWS <br />1990a, Modde and Smith 1995) were based largely on data summaries, this study was designed to collect <br />data necessary to define flows needed by fish and determine whether water management was necessary to <br />achieve those flows. Flow needs in this study were defined as those flows that insure habitat needed for <br />survival of endangered fishes in the Yampa River, as well as those that would insure local and spawning <br />related migratory movement. This study was not designed to define specific water management <br />alternatives. In addition, this study relates only to the baseflow period and makes no recommendation as <br />to the potential trade-offs of storing water during the spring runoff to provide augmentation during the <br />months of August through October. <br /> <br />16 <br />