|
<br />
<br />bility for the New Mexico portion of the Navajo Reservoir to
<br />that agency. A similar agreement providing for State administration
<br />of the Steinaker Reservoir was signed with the Utah State Park and
<br />Recreation Commission on May 9, 1963.
<br />
<br />30 ALLOCATION OF FEDERAL INVESTMENT
<br />
<br />Section 6 of the authorizing act states that upon completion
<br />of each unit, participating project, or separable feature thereof, the
<br />Secretary shall allocate the total cost of constructing said unit,
<br />project, or feature to the various purposes authorized in the act or
<br />authorized under reclamation law. No formal allocations, to the
<br />several purposes to be served by the project have been made of the
<br />cost to June 30, 1963. However, tentative allocations have been
<br />made of the total estimated cost of projects now under construction.
<br />(See schedule No.6.) The tentative allocations are summarized as
<br />follows:
<br />
<br />Note-The above allocation includes only those projects noW under con-
<br />struction.
<br />
<br />Purpose
<br />
<br />Reimbursable allocations:
<br />Irrigation
<br />
<br />power ----...--............----..-- ........----.......--. ......--....--......----..--.....
<br />Municipal and industrial water ......-- ......--.--..--.
<br />
<br />Total ... ........ ... --' ...... ..----. .." ...,. ".. ....... .'" .,...." ........ .....,...
<br />
<br />N onrreimbursable allocations:
<br />
<br />Flo::>d control ....... ........... ..... --.--" .... .--...,.. --...-- ..... ......--.... .....
<br />Fish and Wildlife .--.--..--..-----...--...----- ....-- --..--.............----....
<br />
<br />Recreation .. ..,.... .--.. ----------... --.. ........ ...... ........ ..... --..--.. ............
<br />Other nonreimbursable costs:
<br />Colorado River development fund investigations,
<br />non-Federal contributions, and cost of road
<br />relocations under Public Law 87-874 --......................
<br />
<br />Total .. .." ..... ........., ..... "__"'" ..........__.__ ..' -- ..--" ...., ........ ...u'
<br />
<br />Total
<br />
<br />...................................................--.-._.._.-.......~
<br />
<br />Amount Percent
<br />(thousands)
<br />
<br />$160,926 19.5
<br />590,089 71.6
<br />1,475 .2
<br />752,490 9T.3
<br />- .-
<br />.-
<br />1,837 .2
<br />32,217 3.9
<br />33,195 4.0
<br />4,963_ .6
<br />72.212 8.7
<br />
<br />824,702 100.0
<br />
<br />4. PROGRESS OF RETURN AND REPAYMENT
<br />OF FEDERAL INVESTMENT
<br />
<br />In fiscal year 1963 the repayment of Federal Investment began
<br />with the receipt of $23,900 from the Uintah Water Conservancy
<br />District for their first annual payment for municipal and industrial
<br />water service from the Vernal unit of the Central Utah project.
<br />In addition, miscellaneous nonoperating revenues totaling $39,859
<br />have been returned to the Treasury as a repayment of Federal
<br />investment. At the end of fiscal year 1963 a total of $63,759 of the
<br />., O.u_M+~">"l+ l,,,,, thm; been repaid.
<br />
<br />
<br />Repayment contracts h' h
<br />gation and m . 0 w IC schedule annual
<br />executed with ~~~~~al and indu~trial water fac~~~::e~ts on ~rn-
<br />pating proJ'ects' users orgamzations on the foIl . ave een
<br />o owmg partici-
<br />Central Utah V .
<br />July 14, 1958 ernal umt-Uintah 'Water Conse ..
<br />Emery County E . ........__ .... ..... rvarrcy Dlstnct
<br />iiorida-Florida W~~Z ;fater Cons~'r~;~~';~y' :6i~tr'i~t"'M" ... ....--....: $ 1,500,000
<br />P am~ond-Hammond Coonservancy District Dee 2'9 1a9Y6015, 1962 2.935 000
<br />aoma-N th nservancy D' t" . , 1 '
<br />San J or Fork Water CO IS n<:t, <;kt. 20, 1959 . .. .... .. ,900,000
<br />25,uf~fhama-Middle Rio nG~~~dnc~DIstnct, Aug..21, 1957 ... 2450,000
<br />City ~(Alb~ ............... ..... ..~. .__~.~s.e.n:ancy DIstrict, Ju~~ ,320,000
<br />See.dskadee-State 'l:,'twue, ~une 25, 1963. . . :.: ..... ..... .......... 3,400000
<br />Smith Fork-Crawford ~rrmgc June 14, 1962 ... .--::. :..... -- ..... ... 33.761;000
<br />Total. " u. er onservancy District, M~'y" '1'0 1960-- 900,000
<br />.......... . ..... ' 1.025,000
<br />48,191,000
<br />
<br />5. ESTIMATED RATE OF PROJECT REPAYMENT
<br />YEAR BY YEAR
<br />to Final cost allocation of the F d I 0
<br />e~~~~a~d to other purposes has en~~a b~::estment to power, irriga-
<br />
<br />investme~:~~ :: proglr1ess of project repaym:~d;~a A~cordinglY the
<br />so a ocated is not incl d d . or y year of the
<br />u e m thIS report.
<br />
<br />!
<br />i
<br />~
<br />!
<br />!
<br />~
<br />~
<br />I
<br />i
<br />1:1
<br />j
<br />
|